In the legal system, compliance is the action of following applicable laws and rules and regulations. Which of the following pro
cesses would not be used to demonstrate compliance: a. allowing employees in an organization to create policies for self-governance documents to comply with legal or regulatory requirements at the employees' discretion
b. comparing compliance requirements against an organization's daily practices, and modifying those practices as needed
c. developing and implementing monitoring systems in computer systems to alert the organization if security measures required by law or regulation are compromised
d. creating training and awareness activities that educate employees about compliance requirements
a. allowing employees in an organization to create policies for self-governance documents to comply with legal or regulatory requirements at the employees' discretion
Explanation:
Of the options provided, a. is the one that sticks out as non-compliant. Compliance has to do with the establishment of rules and regulations by an organisation or a government on how to operate.
Allowing employees to create self-governance documents to comply with legal or regulatory requirements at their own discretion would lead to a system of non-uniformity and people would act as they please. That would not be recommended in a system that wants to demonstrate compliance.
Do US Constitution provides the floor beneath individual rights, well stating constitutions can provide greater but not lesser protection. So I think it’s c but I’m not sure!!
