1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alex
3 years ago
6

LUPE was in the grocery store and was having trouble controlling her wild 4-year-old son MIGUELITO. She told him twice to settle

down, and “no” he could not have Fruit Loops. MIGUELITO kept whining and kicking his feet in the cart and throwing a tantrum, as well as throwing the box of Cheerios on the ground. Finally, LUPE had enough, and slapped MIGUELITO across the face, then pointed her finger at him and said to him, “Be quiet!” MIGUELITO continued his tantrum, and LUPE slapped him again. Finally, MIGUELITO acted like a good boy.
Instructions: Evaluate LUPE’s legal liability for this corporal punishment of MIGUELITO. Use an essay format, and separate your response into three numbered paragraphs - one for each of the following questions.

1. Provide the facts that would prove her liability for child abuse (guilty)

- Minimum 100-word response

2. Provide the facts defending her actions as having the right of parental discipline (not guilty).

- Minimum 100-word response

3. How would you decide this case? Make an argument for either guilty or not guilty using the applicable law to support your facts. Explain your reasoning.

- Minimum 300-word response
Law
1 answer:
Simora [160]3 years ago
4 0

Nonaccidental physical injuries children suffer at the hands of their parents occur along a continuum that ranges from mild to severe. At the outer edges of this continuum, one might find, on the one hand, a slight swat to the buttocks, and on the other, a brutal beating. In the United States, the normative consensus appears to be that outsiders to the family are appropriately concerned only when the physical injury at issue causes serious harm; any injury short of a serious one is exclusively “family business.”Consistent with this consensus, all states’ laws permit the use of “reasonable” corporal punishment; simultaneously, they all prohibit non accidentally inflicted serious injury. The latter is generally denominated abuse, although some states classify milder but still impermissible injuries as neglect, or simply “inappropriate discipline.” Thus, being able to distinguish between reasonable corporal punishment and maltreatment—whether this is formally denominated abuse or neglect—is critical for the relevant actors: parents who use corporal punishment as a disciplinary tool, child protective services (CPS) staff who are required by statute to intervene in the family to protect children subject to or at risk of abuse, and courts adjudicating issues arising in connection with these cases. The integrity of the distinction and of the methodology employed to make it is also critical for a society that is prominently committed to both family autonomy and child welfare, and in particular to protecting the integrity of the family when it promotes (or at least does not harm) child welfare, and to intervening in the family when it fails in its related obligations.Unfortunately, few if any states have sufficiently defined the relevant terms “reasonable corporal punishment” or “maltreatment” (abuse or neglect) to consistently guide the relevant actors (those in a single system) in their exercises of discretion; nor have they established a coherent methodology for sorting injuries along the continuum of nonaccidental physical injuries. That administrative regulations and policies promulgated by state and local CPS departments often narrow agency discretion helps CPS itself to be more consistent and may help families know what to expect when they are dealing with CPS. But because appellate courts do not appear to give much deference to agency interpretations of the statutory definitions, these regulations and policies do little to guide the courts’ own exercise of discretion. Moreover, to the extent that the law in statutes and judicial opinions is either less precise or even different from the law as it is applied by CPS, the public and parents are inevitably confused or misled. As a result, decisionmaking about whether an injury or incident remains in the realm of family business or has crossed the line into the impermissible varies, reflecting a multiplicity of purely personal viewpoints, religious and political ideologies, and academic or disciplinary training and requirements. In turn, institutional treatment of and outcomes for children and families are often inconsistent. The status quo has been defended or at least explained on several grounds. The vagueness of abuse definitions has been consistently upheld on policy grounds—specifically on the argument that it is important for authorities to retain flexibility to call injuries as they see them given that, particularly in a diverse society, abuse might appear in unexpected forms.

You might be interested in
I started as a traffic officer and now I am a Captain over the entire police department. I became captain by going to the *
77julia77 [94]

Answer:

police academy for higher education

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
WILL MARK BRAINLIEST FOR CORRECT ANSWER!
Alex73 [517]

Answer:

Senate

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Why was trump impeached
exis [7]

Answer:beacus he was voted out by the senate

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The power of judicial review applies to actions by.
erica [24]

There are different kinds of power. The power of judicial review applies to actions by the legislative, executive, and administrative arms of the government

<h3>What is the power of judicial review?</h3>

The judicial review is known to be the power of the courts of a country to look into the actions of the legislative, executive, and administrative aspect of the government of any country.

They act to known or determine if the actions done by those branches of government are consistent with what is written in the constitution.

Actions seen or  judged as inconsistent are said to be unconstitutional and, therefore regarded as null and void.

Learn more about power of judicial review from

brainly.com/question/4937540

7 0
3 years ago
Sam had just finished a great day of skiing as he walked toward the parking lot with his skis over his shoulders. While waiting
Arte-miy333 [17]

Answer: a. Sam did not intend to harm anyone when he turned to see the source of the sound.

Explanation:

Liabilities are the penalties that one is required to pay with respect to the harm caused to the other parties.The liabilities is the state of being responsible for something especially by the law.

To avoid the liabilities Sam can suggest the fact that he did not intended to cause harm to Pam while turning. He turned to see the source of sound. This happened unintentionally thus he should be free from any kind of liabilities.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • NEED HELP ASAP
    13·2 answers
  • What do park rangers go?
    6·2 answers
  • What is the difference between public forum and private property?
    6·1 answer
  • What is the difference between the police operation and the law enforcement operation?​
    5·1 answer
  • (I'll give you brainliest help me I also got questions on my profile! ) Looking at a lineup of suspects to an armed robbery, Zoe
    14·1 answer
  • How is sovereignty a democratic one​
    13·1 answer
  • In the democracy, what the majority wants is often reflected in policy. Explain two roles of the media in the policy making proc
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a violation of military law?
    12·2 answers
  • The two systems of law in use today are the English common law and the....
    12·2 answers
  • Who is the Ugandan nominee to the International Criminal Court​
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!