Option A and C
In quasi-contract cases, the defendant received a benefit from the plaintiff. In promissory estoppel cases, the defendant made a promise that the plaintiff relied on.
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
A quasi-contract is a retroactive system among two parties who own no prior commitments to one another. It is designed by an expert to change a situation in which one individual takes something at the value of the other. The plaintiff must have provided a substantial thing or service to the added party with the expectation or assumption that mortgage would be supplied.
Promissory estoppel is a concept in contract law that hinders a character from performing reverse on a commitment even if a legitimate contract does not endure.
Answer:
A. Education, savings, and human capital, respectively.
A certain number of qualified voters in a district
Answer: 4%
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Pension plan assets were $1,200 million at the beginning of the year and $1,252 million at the end of the year and that at the end of the year, retiree benefits paid by the trustee were $28 million and cash invested in the pension fund was $32 million.
Based on the above scenario, the percentage rate of return on plan assets goes thus:
Opening balance of plan assets 1200
Add:- Actual return = 48
Add:- contributions = 32
Less :- retiree benefits = -28
Closing balance of plan assets = 1252
It should be noted that the actual return is the balancing figure which is calculated as:
= 1252 + 28 - 1200 - 32
= 48
The percentage rate of return on plan assets will now be:
= 48/1200
=0.04
= 4%
The second deal focused on social welfare to ease the problem brought by the great depression. The goals were: social securities for retirement, employment for those who are unemployed; health services, housing for illegal settlers and improvement on national resources.