How does the choice of a narrator affect the plot of a narrative?

2 answers:

4 0

In this item, we are asked to determine as to how the choice of a narrator affect the plot of a narrative. The answer to this question is that, depending on the choice of a narrator, the point of view is also affected. Thus, the answer to this particular item is the last choice.

jasenka [17]3 years ago

3 0

The way how the choice of a narrator affects the plot of a narrative is that the narrator's point of view affects the amount of information the reader receives. Some points of a narrative an author can consider more important than other ones, and the thing author emphasizes will form a main conflict of a story. The way how author perceives things is illustrated in the amount of information he\she represents.

You might be interested in

1. Traveling is Tom's favorite pastime.

enot [183]

The choice that correctly identifies the type of verb traveling is in each of the sentence above is option A. Sentence 1: gerund, sentence 2: participle.
Sentence 1 uses the word "Traveling" as a gerund. A gerund is a word that takes the verb form -ing, but functions as a noun in the sentence. In sentence 2, the word "traveling" is used as a participle. A participle is a word that also takes the form of a verb, but functions as an adjective or as a noun.

3 0

3 years ago

Read these excerpts.

Natali5045456 [20]

I believe the answer is both the speech and poem are equal when it comes to use of pathos because throughout both of them, they use emotional words to play with the reader's heartstrings.

5 0

2 years ago

“Life is short…” and explain.

Brilliant_brown [7]

<h2> LIFE IS SHORT...</h2>

Life is short because that's what Mother Nature wants to do. If Mother Nature wanted to end life now, Mother Nature would. Life can be short. We don't always know why.

3 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Can anyone help me please ? :(

Tanzania [10]

Answer:

arrangement for things to happen at the same time

8 0

3 years ago

Why do you think Mae was upset with the man in the yellow suit for taking Winnie against her will, even though she had done the

aleksandr82 [10.1K]

Answer:

The scene is similar in that they both took Winnie Foster away from her safety zone, displacing her from her own comfortable place.

But then again, the situations are different as Mae had no evil intention behind her decision to take Winnie. But the man, on the other hand, had far more sinister ideas in mind behind the 'offer' to 'rescue' Winnie from the Tucks.

Explanation:

Natalie Babbitt's children novel Tuck Everlasting tells the story of how a family came to be immortal from their accidental drinking of water from a stream in the forest. And it is this 'immortality' that led to the disastrous event which led to the loss of a good friend Winnie.

When the "man in the yellow suit" took Winnie against her will to return her back to her family, Mae/ Mother Tuck took her husband's shotgun. She fired and killed the man, for she knows that the man wanted nothing but evil intentions. When asked why she did what she did, she replied that "he was taking the child against against her will" which is also exactly what she did.

These two situations of Winnie being taken away against her will are similar in that the two adults took advantage of her, without asking for her approval. Winnie had no choice but do what she is told to do so.

But for Mae, she had no evil intention except reveal the truth about her family's immortality and also provide a chance for her family to have an interaction with a real, living "natural child". But the man had wanted to 'trade' on the water, trying to get it t more deserving people. That is how different the two situations are.

3 0

3 years ago