I don't think parents, should lie to their children, as for children shouldn't lie to their parents. I personally think it is all equal. But if a parent is specifically lying to their children about problems that don't really relay on them, then maybe it's okay. But if it includes divorce, or death's I think that it is not okay for parent's to lie to their children, unless protecting them, from something.
Well, generally I don't agree with keeping animals in the circus.
But I guess in some rare cases, provided that the animals are really well treated (which excludes the bigger species, since they can't possibly not be stressed by the small amount of space circus offers), and provided that for whatever reason they can't live in the wild, (their environment is disappearing or they're hurt and would be rejected in a group), I guess it would be acceptable to keep them in a circus.
It would probably work best for the species that more readily socialize with humans: dogs, some monkeys. Again, this would only be acceptable if animal welfare was always in the first place, and if for examples the animals could refuse performing on a given day.
In those circumstances, a circus could provide a predator- free environment for them, which would be beneficial for the animals (but again, I am very skeptical this is ever the case).
Answer:
I think b the executive branch
Answer:
so probably you didnt ask anything...
The jar in Wallace Stevens's "The Anecdote of the Jar" most likely symbolizes <span>human order and the drive to arrange things according to a pattern. It is there to say that nature cannot be controlled by humans - no matter how hard the narrator tries, he cannot fit the whole of Tennessee into the jar, the same way a man cannot dominate over nature.</span>
