The authors of this editorial is against women’s rights to vote. According to the text, the author stated that “Without the counsel and guidance of men, no woman ever ruled a state wisely or well.” This suggests that the author did not think that women can be smart on these topics. The author also stated, “A characteristic they were born with.” “That they lack the genius of politics.” You can tell that the authors strongly believe that women do not have the skill and genius that men do and that they were born with it and it isn't “curable.” (as they said.) In the first paragraph, they also stated that women suffrage would result horribly for the government and weaken it, as well as for society. Throughout the short article, the beliefs the authors had can be summarized as women not being smart enough, unlike men, and the women suffrage is ridiculous and unnecessary.( please mark as brainliest and 5 stars I really tried!)
When Jose Marti showed Americans how the Spanish treated them, B. They were outraged and demanded action.
<h3>What did Jose Marti do?</h3>
Jose Marti was a Cuban revolutionary should tried to gain support from the U.S. by showing Americans how horribly the Spanish treated Cubans.
His revelations led to widespread outrage in America which caused the U.S. government to pressure Spain to treat Cubans better.
Find out more on Jose Marti at brainly.com/question/14176743.
#SPJ1
The correct answer of the given statement above would be TRUE. It is true that the <span>e-government act promotes the use of electronic government services by the public and improves the use of information technology in the government. Hope this answers your question. </span>
Answer:The south treated their slaves much more fairly than the deep southern states. (South example: North Carolina) (Deep South example: Georgia, South Carolina) Maryland treated their slave fairly, and they were considered a northern state.