Which of the following is a TRUE statement about the Universal Declaration of Human Rights?

History

2 answers:

loris [4]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

the answer is a i did the test and its on quizlet

Explanation:

hope this helps bud

Vesna [10]3 years ago

3 0

I believe the answer is: A. The Declaration cannot be enforced because each nation has its own sovereignty.

This mean that a country does not have the jurisdiction to determine the type of legislation that shall be made by other countries, even if it's based on good intention. But, the universal declaration of human rights create an internationally acknowledge standard on the things that can and cannot be considered a violation of human rights.

You might be interested in

What was the “Solid South”? When did the South stop being the “Solid South”?

Kobotan [32]

The solid south was an electoral voting blog of southern us. Im not sure about the answer to the next question I hope I helped

8 0

3 years ago

Question Navigator Select all choices that apply. 11. (3 pt) Which were physical characteristics of Mesopotamia? Choose all answ

lyudmila [28]

"<span>The rivers of Mesopotamia flooded annually" and "B. Mesopotamia was between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers" are both true, since this was considered to be the Fertile Crescent, since there was such a great amount of growth. </span>

6 0

3 years ago

Why did MLK and John Kerry appose the war

prisoha [69]

Answer:

Both Martin Luther King Jr. and John Kerry opposed the Vietnam War because they both, along with millions of other Americans, thought it was immoral thing to do.

4 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How does the constitution limit the power of the president

Yuki888 [10]

Answer:

if Congress dislikes how the President is enforcing a law, it can block the President's actions by amending the law or passing a new law.

Explanation:

A PRESIDENT CANNOT . . .

make laws.

declare war.

decide how federal money will be spent.

interpret laws.

choose Cabinet members or Supreme Court Justices without Senate approval.

6 0

3 years ago

In Duckworth v. Eagan (1988), the Supreme Court held that the police

myrzilka [38]

<span>In Duckworth v. Eagan, the Supreme Court held the position that the police are not required to give you an exact recounting of your Miranda Rights when you are arrested, so long as what they do say to you still confers to you all the rights you have. The case was brought about when police arresting Gary Eagan did not read him his rights in the correct manner.</span>

8 0

3 years ago