D - to understand the writer's potential bias.
Obviously being on either side of the war would skew the information that would have been written in the journal. For that reason, knowing on which side the woman was would improve and help us to know whether she was subject to any bias.
Answer: The answer will be C
Explanation: Because if they did not have a calendar they to know when they had war
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>B. The empire was ruled with a vast legal code.
</em>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
The Ottomans were known for their accomplishments in artistry, science, and drug. Istanbul and other significant urban areas all through the domain were perceived as aesthetic centers, particularly during the rule of Suleiman the Magnificent.
The Ottoman Empire was gigantically ground-breaking and had the option to protect exchange courses through its regions viably. The Ottomans securely encouraged exchange between the Eastern and Western worlds for several years. The Ottoman Empire made provincial soundness in the Middle East for quite a long time, creating significant commitments to craftsmanship, science, and safeguarding numerous old records from Greco-Roman periods.
Answer:
Option: False
Explanation:
There were indeed more women in English America than in New Spanish and New France. But women in the colonies had very little freedom compared to the men, considered to be inferior in society. Women continued to maintain their virtues and graceful. Generally, they did domestic work along with working in the fields.
Answer:
Specifically, the lack of a strong national government in the Articles of Confederation led to three broad limitations.
Economic disorganization.
Lack of central leadership.
Legislative inefficiencies.
Explanation: