1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sholpan [36]
3 years ago
9

After the civil war, which side helped others with reconstruction

History
1 answer:
Ludmilka [50]3 years ago
7 0
The north helped the south with reconstruction after the south lost the civil war by surrendering to the North which was run by Abraham Lincoln.

Glad I could help
You might be interested in
What process do the events in this timeline reflect?
julia-pushkina [17]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
"A leader is best when people barely know he exists; when his work is done, his aim fulfilled, they will say: we did it ourselve
mr Goodwill [35]
Looking at a question, it's more of an opinion than a right or wrong answer?

Nevertheless, personally I agree with the quote. Instead of a sole ruler who wants to do everything himself and makes it known to people below his status, a good leader would be somewhat "among us". He does his job, and lets us do  ours (not disturbing us), or in most cases, leading us instead of controlling us. This would be more productive and meaningful, and peoples' morale and teamwork is boosted.
3 0
3 years ago
Which two states had populations of 5–15 million?
Ber [7]

Answer:

Correct answer is Michigan and New Jersey.

Explanation:

According to official information that are provided Michigan has 9.97 million inhabitants, while New Jersey has around 8.88 million inhabitants.

Just for comparison this is approximately the population of certain countries, such as Austria and Belarus for example in Europe.

8 0
3 years ago
Did the Native Americans believe that acquiring possessions was an important goal?
ohaa [14]

Answer:

Explanation:At the start of the twentieth century there were approximately 250,000 Native Americans in the USA – just 0.3 per cent of the population – most living on reservations where they exercised a limited degree of self-government. During the course of the nineteenth century they had been deprived of much of their land by forced removal westwards, by a succession of treaties (which were often not honoured by the white authorities) and by military defeat by the USA as it expanded its control over the American West.  

In 1831 the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall, had attempted to define their status. He declared that Indian tribes were ‘domestic dependent nations’ whose ‘relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian’. Marshall was, in effect, recognising that America’s Indians are unique in that, unlike any other minority, they are both separate nations and part of the United States. This helps to explain why relations between the federal government and the Native Americans have been so troubled. A guardian prepares his ward for adult independence, and so Marshall’s judgement implies that US policy should aim to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream US culture. But a guardian also protects and nurtures a ward until adulthood is achieved, and therefore Marshall also suggests that the federal government has a special obligation to care for its Native American population. As a result, federal policy towards Native Americans has lurched back and forth, sometimes aiming for assimilation and, at other times, recognising its responsibility for assisting Indian development.

What complicates the story further is that (again, unlike other minorities seeking recognition of their civil rights) Indians have possessed some valuable reservation land and resources over which white Americans have cast envious eyes. Much of this was subsequently lost and, as a result, the history of Native Americans is often presented as a morality tale. White Americans, headed by the federal government, were the ‘bad guys’, cheating Indians out of their land and resources. Native Americans were the ‘good guys’, attempting to maintain a traditional way of life much more in harmony with nature and the environment than the rampant capitalism of white America, but powerless to defend their interests. Only twice, according to this narrative, did the federal government redeem itself: firstly during the Indian New Deal from 1933 to 1945, and secondly in the final decades of the century when Congress belatedly attempted to redress some Native American grievances.

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Haitian Revolution
Alja [10]

Answer:

Explanation:

d. resulted in a great economic depression in the other Caribbean colonies.

plz mark it as brainliest

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following was not one of the arguments the Five Tribes made in response to the United States’ demands during the Fo
    12·2 answers
  • 2. What are the goals of socialism?
    5·2 answers
  • What was voter's choose in the election of 1800.​
    6·1 answer
  • PLZ ANSWER ASAP!
    15·2 answers
  • PLEASE HURRY AND HELP. What were the effects of the Yom Kippur War? Check all that apply.
    15·2 answers
  • Which condition made possible the Gupta golden age
    14·2 answers
  • ASAP, WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!
    15·1 answer
  • What is a political party platform
    13·1 answer
  • Why was the Ottoman Empire very stable for a long time?
    8·1 answer
  • The one thing all Progressives had in common was their desire to:
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!