When there is an increase in government spending, there will be an increase on the output, price level, and interest rates
<h3>What is a
government spending?</h3>
This refers to the funds injected to the public sector on the acquisition of services such as education, healthcare, social protection, defense etc.
Most time, the effect of an an increase in government spending leads to an increase on the output, price level, and interest rates as it is a method of stimulate demand.
Therefore, the Option A is correct.
Read more about government spending
<em>brainly.com/question/25125137</em>
#SPJ1
Answer:
c. a difference in the subject matters of operas X and Y
Explanation:
All factors could directly explain the fact that opera Y generated far greater net profits that did opera X except for this one. Although the subject matter might have some impact on sales, it could not do so in a direct way. It could only do so if we take other factors into account, such as the cost of producing a particular opera or the interest that people have on an opera (which results in greater or lesser ticket sales).
Answer:
$1,002,000
Explanation:
The costs incurred on the share for share exchange include the fair value per share ,issue costs,direct cost as well as contingent consideration(consideration based on the acquired business performance.
However,the costs eligible to be recorded as investment upon acquisition are the fair value per share and the contingent obligation as shown below:
Fair value (entire shares) $50*20,000=$1,000,000
fair value of potential obligation =$2000
total value of investment $1,002,000
The issue costs and direct should be expensed immediately.
Answer: the answer is : What problems are most likely to happen?
Explanation:
Answer:
REDISTRIBUTION
Explanation:
Redistribution of assets and income can be defined as social mechanism like taxes, education, healthcare, government services, political reform, fiscal policy, confiscation, separation or tort rule is the redistribution of wealth and income from some persons to others.
The phrase's meanings differ, based on private experiences, political philosophies and limited statistical usage. In politics, it is often said, probably referring to supposed transfers of wealth from those with more to those who have less.
