The answer is D.
extra wording :)
Answer:
The truimph of the proletariat.
Explanation: Marx believed that workers would ultimately truimph and capitalism would be defeated
It casued the great rural-urban mirgration of farmers to the cities looking for new jobs and led to the develpment of many technologies like penecillin, a commen vacine
Answer:
Debido al segundo triunvirato.
Explicación:
Octavio encuentra la fundación del Imperio Romano más fácil porque es uno de los miembros del triunvirato. Triunvirato es un grupo de tres pueblos poderosos del imperio. Son políticamente muy fuertes, por lo que debido al segundo triunvirato, Octavio sentó las bases del Imperio Romano fácilmente. También demostró ser un verdadero heredero del trono debido a su relación con el rey y al derrotar enemigos en muchas guerras y salva al Imperio Romano.
Answer:
Explanation:
This is tough and requires a level of interpretation. I will refer to the modifications in the box as 1-3 in the order they are listed and the possible answers I will refer as a-d in the order they are listed. Lets analyze:
First the question; it's asking us, based on 1-3, which one of a-d are the most true to answer the question, "why did the colonist modify the environment?"
I will start with what is most false and work to find our answer. B is not the answer. Nothing in 1, 2, or 3 applies specifically to protection.
C is not the best choice. While 1 and 3 could apply, 2 simply does not.
D is a tough one. It could be argued that the impact of all 3 answers are to encourage development of the trade we with England, but that is relying on outside information not provided to us. The statements 1, 2 and 3 have no specific mention of britain or trading.
That leaves A. 1 says clearing forests for lumber. Lumber is an economic good. 2 is also a economic good. 3 applies to transportation of goods as well as the town's that are needed for people to live and trade goods and services.
I believe answer A is the best choice.
