Answer:
A President Truman learned of the success of the Manhattan Project
Explanation:
American President Harry Truman made the decision to use the devastating atomic bomb on Japan as a direct response to the Pear Harbor attack on American soil.
The direct result of this was that the Japanese gave their unconditional surrender and the war was ended.
However, the indirect result of the decision to drop the atomic bomb was that President Truman learned of the success of the Manhattan project which was the atomic bomb.
Answer:
Explanation:
As additional forces came to Alaric’s side, Emperor Honorius did little to help the city and oppose Alaric. The Goths were still viewed as barbarians and no match for the armies of the empire. Although the treasury was virtually empty, the Senate finally succumbed, and wagons left the city carrying two tons of gold, 13 tons of silver, 4,000 silk tunics, 3,000 fleeces, and 3,000 pounds of pepper. Alaric eased the siege, still hoping to negotiate terms, but Honorius remained blind to the seriousness of the situation. While temporarily agreeing to Alaric’s demands - something he never intended to honor - 6,000 Roman soldiers were sent to the city but were quickly defeated by Alaric’s brother-in-law Athaulf.
<span>Let’s
start with the Cardinal first. Richelieu was a talented statesman and
politician, and as Chief Minister of the king (Louis XIII at that time) he
consolidated royal power at the expense of the nobles, and made France a strong
centralized state. The King Louis XIV, basically, followed the Cardinal’s
footsteps and went further by housing most of them in the Versailles Palace. In
addition, the king used entertaining, impressing, and domesticating them with
extravagant luxury to keep a close eye and a heavy heel on the aristocracy.</span>
Answer:
Napoleon invades Spain and forces King Ferdinand VII to abdicate. He places his brother, Joseph Bonaparte on the Spanish Throne. With no Spanish government on the throne - Colonies must look after themselves.
Hey there,
Your question states: <span>Which aspect of Charybdis frightens the men more? How does the poet’s language convey this fearfulness? Well, it really all depends on what "Charybdis" is saying to the men. This would be a reason why the men would be frighten. So maybe he were to say things like there death could come to life, or things in that sort. And based on this poet's language, this would convey that anything could be fearless to anyone, it just really depends on what you say and on how you say it.
Hope this helps.</span>
