Answer:
E. Majority rule without the tempering influence of debate and discussion.
Explanation:
The danger of majority tyranny in a democracy most likely would result from majority rule without the tempering influence of debate and discussion.
Answer:
There are two primary rules of thumb for deciding if intellectual property protection should be pursued for a particular intellectual asset. First, a firm should determine if the intellectual property has value in the marketplace. Second, a firm should determine if its intellectual property has value in marketplace.
Explanation:
An intellectual property is anything that is as a result of creativeness and has value in the marketplace. They are Four Key Forms of Intellectual Property which are patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets . Intellectual property laws are made to encourage creativity and inventiveness by granting to individuals who spent their time and money in creative endeavors exclusive rights for a period of time so as to benefit from their creativity.
There are two primary rules of thumb for deciding if intellectual property protection should be pursued for a particular intellectual asset. First, a firm should determine if the intellectual property has value in the marketplace. Second, a firm should determine if its intellectual property has value in marketplace.
Answer:
The product owner should say:
The team will need about 3 Sprints more to complete the product release.
Explanation:
As given the team's average velocity in the past 3 Sprints has been 65 points and best sprint among three was 85 points. There were 140 story points worth of work in the project.
So, if the team keep such a performance then,
three sprints can get = 3 x 65 points
Three sprints can get = 195 points
So, the team will need about 3 sprints more to complete the product release.
Answer:
(A) should be based on fairness, honesty, openness, and moral integrity.
