Lila is a university biology professor. She won't be teaching next semester; instead, she will use her time in South America to research the disease traits of mosquitoes. During her leave of absence, she will be able to learn new teaching techniques. This demonstrates the idea of a (n) <u>sabbatical</u>.
Sabbaticals are periods of time off from employment. The Biblical custom of shmita (a sabbatical year), which is tied to agriculture, provides the basis for the idea of the sabbatical. Every seven years, Jews in the Land of Israel are required to take a year off from working the fields, according to Leviticus 25. Many universities and other institutional employers of scientists, doctors, and academics now provide the opportunity to qualify for paid sabbatical as an employee benefit, known as sabbatical leave, starting with Harvard in 1880. Today's academic sabbaticals often free the grantee from their regular teaching duties and departmental responsibilities, yet research work is nevertheless anticipated to continue, if not accelerate, during their absence. Academic breaks can be either a whole academic year or a semester-long break.
The term "sabbatical" has also evolved to refer to an extended, intentional career pause. According to a Society for Human Resource Management poll, non-academic sabbaticals have increased in popularity in the twenty-first century. There aren't many conventions and standards governing non-academic or professional sabbaticals. They may be paid or unpaid, related to one's job or self-directed, and may last anywhere from a few weeks to more than a year.
Learn more about 'sabbatical leave' here:
brainly.com/question/28013907
#SPJ4
Answer:
d. Forcing
Explanation:
Forcing technique: The term "forcing technique" is described as one of the different techniques of conflict resolution in which an individual tends to use some power or formal authority that he or she possesses in order to satisfy his or her concern in the absence of any regard associated with the party or person with whom he or she in conflict with.
In the question above, the given statement represents the forcing technique of conflict resolution.
By implementation of black codes and Jim crow laws, Southerners were able to restrict the rights of African Americans in the late 1800.
Explanation:
After the civil war, the confederate states were quick to envisage what was known to be black codes. These were laws that were advocated with the desire to bring back the same conditions that prevailed during the slavery. These laws insisted the African Americans to work for low wages and restricted their freedom to associate with one another in the same country. Black code were created by the white law makers who desired to prove their dominance in the country.
Prevalence of slavery in the antebellum south is the major cause in fact for the American economy to attain stability. Jim crow laws legalized segregation of people based on their race and ethnicity. It was considered to be legal based on the doctrine 'separate but equal' mentioned in the constitution.
The correct answer would be option C, It is void.
An unscrupulous investor completes a contract with a buyer to sell a property the investor does not own. This sales contract for the transaction is Void.
Explanation:
When something is not legally bounded, or there is no legal restrictions to carry that thing, then this would be considered void. An invalid, null or cancelled thing is called as void.
So according to the question, when a dishonest, and unfair person or investor makes a deal with the buyer to sell a property which he does not own, and goes into a contract with him, then the contract is void, because the person himself does not own the property he is going to sell. There will be no legal binding of this contract.
Learn more about Void Contract at:
brainly.com/question/9582675
#LearnWithBrainly
