Description of dred scott v. sandford

2 answers:

5 0

In Dred Scott v. Sandford (argued 1856 -- decided 1857), the Supreme Court ruled that Americans of African descent, whether free or slave, were not American citizens and could not sue in federal court. The Court also ruled that Congress lacked power to ban slavery in the U.S. territories.

soldier1979 [14.2K]2 years ago

4 0

In dred scott v sandford the Supreme Court ruled that Americans of African descent, whether free or slave, were not American citizens. The court also ruled that Congress lacked power to ban slavery in the U.S. territories. This case was the most important slavery-related decision in the United States Supreme Court's history. case was argued 1856, decided 1857

You might be interested in

Here you go enjoy....<br> have a god day...

ArbitrLikvidat [17]

Answer:

Thank You. Also, have a nice day as well

Explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

What does the saying every vote counts mean

Ber [7]

A joint resolution to amend the United States constitution.

3 0

3 years ago

which of these statements best describes the views of nativists in the late 1800sThey believed that immigrants were inferior to

Hatshy [7]

The correct answer is They believed that immigrants were inferior to individuals born in the United States.

Nativism is a term that refers to a belief system in which individuals born in a specific country feel that they are better than individuals who were born elsewhere and moved to this country. This idea is usually rooted in fear during American history, as many nativists fear that immigrants will take jobs from native born American citizens. Nativism is a constant theme in American history, especially during the middle of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century.

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

If you can love god & believe in him...

FromTheMoon [43]

Answer:

yes I believe in God and I love Him because He helped me pass my K.C.P.E

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Based on the excerpt, how was the Magna Carta a step toward democracy?

fomenos

Answer:

Explanation:

Because it was a document that laid out specifically what the monarch could and could not do. For the first time limits were put on royal power and it eventually permitted a collection of the most powerful nobles who would act on behalf of the state rather than in allegiance to the monarch who were known as the Great Council which ultimately developed into the English Parliament.

6 0

3 years ago