Answer:
lots of love?&3&3&3&3&3&3&
Answer:
The answer is that the net income under absorption costing would be higher than the net income under variable costing.
Explanation:
Absorption costing and variable costing are terms used in accounting contexts. Absorption costing, also known as full costing, incurs overhead costs when the product is sold; not before it. Variable costing, also referred to as direct costing, would include overhead costs during the period the costs occurred. In this condition, net income would be higher using absorption since overhead costs would not be included until the product is sold.
Answer:
the total contribution margin is $245,700
Explanation:
The computation of the total contribution margin in the case when the sales volume rise by 40% is shown below:
Since the sales volume is rise so the contribution margin is also rise by 40%
Therefore the total contribution margin would be
= Contribution margin × (1 + increased percentage)
= $175,500 × (1 + 0.40)
= $175,500 × 1.40
= $245,700
Hence, the total contribution margin is $245,700
Answer:
Accrual method
Explanation:
As the average annual growth receipts is $27,000,000 which is greater than the $25,000,000 this amount reflects an exception due to which it cannot be applied for cash
Also the accrual method is also selected because it helps while subtracting the expenses instead of cash basis plus it also provides an accurate amount as compared with other methods. And, there is no need to maintain separate books for the purpose of tax
down the net income from the peak tax bracket.
Answer:
d. $30,000.
Explanation:
Jack is entitled to 100% of his own contributions = $9,000 + $4,000 = $13,000
The following is the least generous vesting schedule
Least-generous graded vesting schedule
Years of service % vested
1 0%
2 20%
3 40%
4
60%
5 80%
6 100%
Since jack worked for 57 months, he is entitled to 100% of the employer's contributions = $12,000 + $5,000 = $17,000
Total account balance = $13,000 + $17,000 = $30,000