Answer:
Choosing alternative B would increase net income by $17,100
Explanation:
The analysis showing the incremental revenues,costs and net income of alternative A and B is shown below:
Alternative A Alternative B Difference between A&B
Revenues $146,100 $185,900 $39800
Costs ($104,400) ($127,100) ($22700
)
Net income $41,700 $58,800 $17,100
Alternative B records a higher net income compared to Alternative A,hence choosing alternative B would increase net income by $17,100
r
Purchases = Sales units + Closing inventory - Beginning Inventory
= 7,400 + (2,400 * 120%) - 2,400
= 7,800 units
Answer:
Hanna is correct.
Explanation:
The sale of the 2004 Dodge cannot be construed to be a sale of goods under the Uniform Commercial Code since this law covers sales of goods by merchants. Hanna cannot be said to be a merchant of 2004 Dodge as she is not known to be in the business for the purchase and sale of cars. Therefore, the case should be adjudicated under the common law. What has taken place in this instance is the exchange of a personal asset. Hanna cannot make a trading profit from the sale, but a capital gain. Rachel is not correct.
Answer:
The answer is: C) 2.5 and producers are very responsive to the price change.
Explanation:
The price elasticity of supply refers to what percentage does the quantity supplied change when the price of the good changes in 1%. It is calculated using the following formula:
- price elasticity = % change in quantity supplied / % change in price
Price elasticity of supply of tablets = 20% / 8% = 2.5
For every 1% that the price increases, the quantity supplied will increase by 2.5%.
Since PES > 1, the supply is very price elastic.
