1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Svet_ta [14]
3 years ago
9

What role should the government and the American people play in preserving the various forms of life on earth?

English
1 answer:
Alekssandra [29.7K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

There is an ongoing debate about the appropriate role of government for solving environmental problems, with many environmentalists calling for increased government intervention and many people more predisposed to individual responsibility calling for less.

Without getting into a long discussion on political and economic philosophy (for now), here are a few observations on this important topic:

Proponents of classic liberalism — property rights, free markets, the rule of law, individual freedom — assume that as information improves, private markets will lead to the increased preservation of environmental resources, and that externalities (e.g., pollution) will be internalized (e.g., taken into account by private actors) given a system of strong property rights. While much improvement in the environmental arena has occurred for this very reason, and much of this is due to property rights and better scientific knowledge, many famous economists vastly under-estimated the level of coordination required to tackle some of the world’s most serious environmental problems. Issues such as global warming and the loss of biodiversity require much more government intervention then had previously been assumed. This is not to say that this government intervention won’t rely heavily on the workings of the market system, but only that top-down regulation is absolutely necessary. There is simply no way to adequately address these issues without a strong commitment from the federal government, which will eventually include a high level of international cooperation. Policies such as absolute limits on CO2, government funding of alternative-energy systems, and coordinated efforts to purchase and protect biodiversity hotspots around the world will need to be a major component of future government policy.

Facing increased probabilities of natural disasters (many presumably due to global warming), the government should move us towards a more rational method of risk management in areas prone to natural disasters. It is highly inefficient, as well as an abrogation of government responsibility, to create incentives for people to live in areas that are both dangerous and prone to catastrophe by providing them with reconstruction aid every time disaster strikes. The government has two options; either require that all people living in hurricane zones, flood plains, or near fault lines purchase private insurance, or make it absolutely clear that people will not be compensated for their loss of property by the government if disaster strikes. Such a policy would no doubt lead to dramatic shifts in the population densities in many disaster-prone areas of the country, and perhaps some one-time assistance for relocation would be required. The net effect would be to dramatically reduce future losses of life and property and save the government hundreds of billions in future costs. It would also force private actors (notably insurance companies) to fully take into account the effects of environmental externalities that until now have largely been ignored.

Regarding personal health and risk, the government must play a much more active role than typically advocated by some of the strongest proponents of free markets. Milton Friedman famously noted that there is no use for the Food and Drug Administration since companies whose products lead to illness will be forced out of the market (i.e., products that make people sick will not be bought). What he failed to realize is that if someone gets sick, it is extremely difficult to trace the source of the illness, and without government regulation many companies that poison consumers could in fact operate profitably for long periods of time. But Friedman did have a point in that as people look more and more toward government to regulate the economy, they sometimes do decrease the effort they invest in making wise choices for themselves (e.g., does anyone really need the government to tell them that “fast food” is bad for you?). This being said, it is clear that in this highly complex and inter-connected system, where we all are exposed to thousands of chemicals a year, many of which interact in ways that aren’t yet fully understood, where it is hard to trace the origin of products, and where the effects of these products often don’t manifest for years, the government must play an active role in regulation. The information problems are too complex for individuals to cope with (and, unfortunately, governments, at this point). The Food and Drug Administration, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture should all be well-funded, be decoupled from conflicts of interest with industry, and their mandate to protect the public welfare through rational risk assessment should be strengthened.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How does the Marigold story relate to things today? What are some similarities? What are some differences? Please write a 7 sent
SIZIF [17.4K]

Answer:

how yall doin

Explanation:

sggdgeheueieieieie

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the book haroun and the sea of stories, what does khattam-shud show haroun on the ship?
den301095 [7]

Answer: Khattam-Shud shows Haroun on the ship that each story in the Ocean requires its own type of poison to properly ruin it, and suggests how one can ruin different types of stories. Iff mutters that to ruin an Ocean of Stories, you add a Khattam-Shud. The Cultmaster continues that each story has an anti-story that cancels the original story out, which he mixes on the ship and pours into the ocean. Haroun, stunned, asks why Khattam-Shud hates stories so much, and says that stories are fun. Khattam Shud replies that the world isn't for fun, it's for controlling. He continues that in each story there is a world he cannot control, which is why he must kill them.

Explanation:

Iff here simplifies Khattam-Shud's explanation, as all that's needed to really end a story is to say it's over. However, Khattam-Shud is working to not just end stories by simply saying they're over, but to make them unappealing to audiences, which will then insure that they won't be told, Silence Laws or not. Think about the ancient stories around the Wellspring; they exist as an example of what happens when stories are deemed boring and not useful.

4 0
3 years ago
What 3 things stood out to you in romeo and juliet the most and why?
umka2103 [35]

Answer:

1.)The fact that even though their love was forbidden they still found a way to be with each other. That stuck out to me because no matter what was in their way the love they had for each other was always stronger than what they had to overcome

2.) Instead of talking to each other to figure things out they both ended up dying due to lack of communication. That stuck out to me because the ending couldve have been so different if they had talked things out before they acted on them.

3.) Romeo and juliet risked everything their families, lovers, friends. They had no problem throwing those things away for each other their commitment to each other was so strong. That stuck out to me because now adays not everyone is willing to drop everything for the one person they love.

Explanation: rewrite it however u want or choose completely different ones its up to u :)

4 0
2 years ago
Write a story about this picture. Look at the picture. A man is using a snowshoe to dig the airplane out of the snow. In the box
Andru [333]
Hi there im alex, today my new airplane hot dug up with snow! Can you belive it i have to use a snowshoe to dig it out becouse it wont work if i dont dig it out .
4 0
2 years ago
Silent spring rachel carson what is the best description of the authors purpose in this passage?
Galina-37 [17]

The Authors Purpose Is About HEr Making A Brighter Future


6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • "As one of our outstanding historical figures once said, ‘When a great democracy is destroyed, it will not be because of enemies
    9·1 answer
  • Why doesn't Juliet tell Nurse about her plan to escape the wedding
    8·2 answers
  • Which competency is most closely associated with interpersonal skills?
    13·1 answer
  • Do four year colleges offer on-campus housing
    9·1 answer
  • What do you think happened to Mrs. Drover at the end? Explain, using
    7·1 answer
  • Do you think an argument has enough evidence to be right or wrong, or at the end it will all be based on personal opinion, exper
    8·1 answer
  • Compare and contrast the role of drama in Ancient Greece and in our culture today.
    11·1 answer
  • 5. Why do you think "bipartisan foreign policy" would be meaningless without a "bipartisan approach
    9·1 answer
  • Who else is sad cuz i am and i don't want to talk about it
    8·2 answers
  • Jessica and I brainstormed ideas for our research projects together, so my experiment was both similar and different from
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!