Answer:
The answers to the two questions are detailed in the explanation;
Explanation:
1.In this first case, David Wallace may possibly win, since a single creditor as a witness that due to the negligence of the director of the company did not receive his payment is not enough evidence for a lawsuit.
There should be more creditors who are dissatisfied with this situation, and it must also be analyzed what were the real causes that led to the company not having made the corresponding payment to this creditor.
2.In this second situation, the company Dunder Company may possibly win, since the corporation breached a previously established contract, this establishes the basis for a lawsuit in which Papers Import must possibly comply with the provisions of the contract or compensate the damages caused to the Dunder Company.
Answer:
$1,305,600
Explanation:
Date of acquisition = Jan, 1 2016
Cost of purchase = $1,904,000
Initial useful life - 15 years
Initial amortization - 1904000/14
= $126,933
Date of review of amortization policy -2019
Accumulated amortization before 2019 -126,933.33*3=380800
Remaining useful years at December 2019 7
Amortization in 2019 =1904000-380800/7 =217,600
Carrying value at December 2019 = 1904000 - (380800 +217600) =1305600 Please note that change in amortization policy can only be applied progressively and not retrospectively
Answer:
$5.00
Explanation:
Preparation of the 2021 EPS presentation for the Esposito Import Company
Earnings per share:
Income from continuing operations$7.00
Less Loss from discontinued operations(2.0)
Net income $5.00
Therefore the Net income after the Preparation of the 2021 EPS presentation for the Esposito Import Company is $5.00
Answer:
$ 3,085
Explanation:
Given that;
The present value(PV) ------ ???
Future payment (F) ---- $5,000
The annual effective rate are 4%, 5% and 5.5% respectively, which can be illustrated as;
r = 0.04, 0.05 and 0.055 respectively.
The present value formula is given as:
PV = 5000 × (1.04)⁻³(1.05)⁻²(1.055)⁻⁵
= $ 3,084.814759
≅ $ 3,085
