All categories

3 years ago

Which statement summarizes the main purpose of photosynthesis?

History

2 answers:

Serhud [2]3 years ago

5 0

The best answer is “It converts light energy to chemical energy”.

Photosynthesis fulfills many functions as those described in the other options, however the primary function is to perform a chemical reaction that needs the energy provided by sunlight and captured by the chlorophyll found in the green leaves of plants, to combine water molecules obtained by the roots and conducted by the stem to the leaves, in turn bringing mineral salts from the soil, the carbon dioxide molecules obtained by the respiration of the plants; and obtain as a result chemical energy in the form of glucose (simple vegetable sugar) that is stored for use in different functions of plant growth.

In the chemical process of photosynthesis, oxygen molecules are released, carbon dioxide is absorbed, energy is converted into mass, etc., but the central purpose of photosynthesis is to take advantage of the light energy provided by the sun, to transform the carbon and oxygen contributed by the carbon dioxide gas and the hydrogen and oxygen molecules contributed by the water in chemical energy to be stored and then used by the plant for its growth.

Aleksandr-060686 [28]3 years ago

4 0

For one this isn't a history question its biology and number two the answer is C. it converts light energy to chemical energy

You might be interested in

Which helped convince the United States to enter World War I on the side of the Allies?

Step2247 [10]

Answer:

Unrestricted submarine warfare by Germany

Explanation:

Did you know that Germany sunk the ship with passengers called "The Lusitania"? Germans thought it might have been a allied ship carrying ammunition, and weapons. A total of 1,195 people we killed. Including 128 Americans.

6 0

3 years ago

what are three ways the Catawba,Cherokee, and Yamassee tribes were similar. then what are one or two ways they are different

sleet_krkn [62]

Three similarities: 1.Catawba, Cherokee and Yamassee all these three tribes belong to native american, 2. They were eastern woodland tribes of South Carolina, 3. They all spoke in same language.

Difference: 1. Though these three tribe lived in South Carolina but physiographically their location was different. Catawba lived in piedmont region, Cherokee lived in mountains and Yamassee lived in Coastal region.

Explanation:

Catawba, Cherokee and Yamassee all these three tribes lived in South Carolina. They were all native americans. They used to live in different physiographic unit like Catawba lived in Piedmont zone that is the bottom of mountain. Cherokee lived in mountain area and Yammasse lived in coastal areas.

Catawba known as river people, Cherokees are real people, Yammasse are coastal people. These tribal people used same languages for communication and do hunting, gathering, pottering for earning livelihood.

3 0

3 years ago

There are some core concepts that shape the outlook of political scientists which include ___ ( Check all that apply.)

Nataliya [291]

Answer:

Power and Justice

Explanation:

Given that Political Concept is a term that describes the important ideas relating to a political situation, such as decision making in an organization or groups. Some of the core concepts that shape the outlook of political scientists are:

1. Authority

2. Democracy

3. Equality

4. Freedom

5. Justice

6. Power

Aside from those core concepts mentioned above, there are other core concepts that exemplify essential political importance and principles.

Therefore, considering the available options, the correct answers are: Power and Justice

8 0

2 years ago

In order to pay its war debt, Germany

Strike441 [17]

Answer:

In 1924, the Dawes Plan reduced Germany's war debt and forced it to adopt a new currency. Reparations continued to be paid through a strange round robin: The U.S. lent Germany money to pay reparations, and the countries that collected reparations payment used that money to pay off United States debts.

Explanation:

3 0

2 years ago

Brainliest for whoever answers quickest and correctly

Black_prince [1.1K]

Answer:

1. D

2. A

3. C

4. The Democratic Party is making a serious blunder in criticizing President Roosevelt’s foreign policy .

There can result nothing but praise and admiration for the President’s policy.

Explanation:

In 1902, the European forces announced blockage on Venezuela due to the country’s rejection to resolve foreign debts. In consequence, the Roosevelt Corollary came into force.

In 1904, the US president Theodore Roosevelt put in force the Roosevelt Corollary, an extension to the Monroe doctrine. It assured the protection of the US over the countries of Latin America and its intervention in foreign affairs regarding the European countries.

The US had made it clear that they were a force to fear and Theodore Roosevelt was aware of that. They were an established military force as had been proven by its great victory against Spain in 1898.

This was what was pre-required for Roosevelt to exercise his Big Stick policy: the country had to have proven capable to strike, but peaceful and willing to negotiate at a time. It seemed to work as Germany decided to back off on Venezuelan blockage after the US intervention.

Before the completion of the Panama Canal, the US trade route was incredibly long and devastating. On top, the perishable goods would have spoiled during the (at least) three-month-long trip.

The Panama Canal facilitated all of that. The US boats had a significantly shorter route to take, the former time was cut and it allowed faster shipping, lower fuel costs, and therefore – more trade.

The Democratic Party is making a serious blunder in criticizing President Roosevelt’s foreign policy

In this sentence, it is the word blunder that suggests the writer’s attitude on the matter. A blunder is a stupid mistake committed out of ignorance. The use of this type of word originates from a subjective point of view.

There can result nothing but praise and admiration for the President’s policy.

The author of the text is clearly taking sides, as he assures that there is only one possible way to think of the President Roosevelt’s policy: nothing but praise and admiration.

7 0

3 years ago