Answer:
It is about a refusal to accept the spread of Protestantism
Explanation:
This quote is from the "The Canons and Decrees of the Sacred and Œcumenical Council of Trent"
The Council of Trent was the formal Roman Catholic reply to the doctrinal challenges of the Protestant Reformation. It served to define Catholic doctrine and made sweeping decrees on self-reform, helping to revitalize the Roman Catholic Church in the face of Protestant expansion.
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
Anotar la opinión de al menos tres integrantes de tu grupo familiar o de amigos acerca de los navegadores y buscadores de internet navegadores
Opinión de mi papá.
"A mi me gusta el navegador M*zila porque no contienen tantos anuncios al principio de su búsqueda, en comparación a G**gle, que te inunda con publicidad y sitios pagados. La navegación en esta plataforma es rápida y amigable."
Opinión de mi mamá:
Ya he leído muchos artículos en el periódico y la internet, hablando de cómo G**gle se queda con todo tu información. Te rastrea, te sigue, se queda con esa información y la usa para venderla a otras empresas de mercadotecnia y publicidad. A mi no me gusta que me espíen. Por eso dejé de usar ese buscador y ahora uso Qw*nt, un buscador europeo que respeta tu privacidad y no guarda tu información."
Opinión de mi tío:
Yo sólo uso los buscadores para cuestiones de trabajo. Qw*nt es el que me gusta más porque respeta la privacidad de las personas. Es rápido, eficiente, te da muchas opciones y no aparece tanta basura ni anuncios como lo hacen otros buscadores."
Answer:
C)
Explanation: I have found the rest of your question.
We had to avoid wounding Austria too severely; we had to avoid leaving behind in her any unnecessary bitterness of feeling or desire for revenge; we ought rather to reserve the possibility of becoming friends again with our adversary of the moment, and in any case to regard the Austrian state as a piece on the European chessboard. If Austria were severely injured, she would become the ally of France and of every other opponent of ours; she would even sacrifice her anti-Russian interests for the sake of revenge on Prussia. . . . The acquisition of provinces like Austria Silesia and portions of Bohemia could not strengthen the Prussian state; it would not lead to an amalgamation of German Austria with Prussia, and Vienna could not be governed from Berlin as a mere dependency. . . . Austria's conflict and rivalry with us was no more culpable than ours with her; our task was the establishment or foundation of German national unity under the leadership of the King of Prussia.
Which argument is Otto von Bismarck making in this excerpt?
A. He is insisting that German unification should be the force that unites all German speakers in Europe.
B. He is offering to defend German Austria from Bohemian nationalism in the Austro-Hungarian Empire.
C. He is rejecting the idea that German Austria should be made a part of a future united Germany.
D. He is warning the Prussian king not to go to war with Austria over Russian territory.
- The answer is C because his argument at the beginning is saying that they should avoid wounding Austria too harsh because if Austria were injured then she will become the ally of France and his rival and that they will tend to revenge and conflicts of the Prussian state and that will not lead to an amalgamation.
Answer:
Uncertain - 99%.
Explanation:
Predicting or forecasting the future could be measured with a sense of certainty or uncertainty. If a person sees dark clouds on the sky, they would be more certain than uncertain that it's an omen of rain. If you are collecting relevant data and then apply it to a forecast having less than 1% of certainty of reducing the degree of risk, conditions are uncertain. And, if measured from 1% to 100%, substracting that 1% of certainty leaves a 99& of uncertainty.
District of Columbia's gun control laws were the subject of a 2008 supreme court decision that ruled for an individual right to possess a firearm for lawful purposes.
What is the District of Columbia v. Heller case?
In the case of District of Columbia v. Heller, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on June 26, 2008, by a vote of 5 to 4, that the Second Amendment guarantees a person's right to own firearms without having to participate in a state militia and to use firearms for conventionally legal purposes, such as self-defense inside the home. The Second Amendment's interpretation was examined in this case for the first time since the United
The case known as District of Columbia v. Heller was first brought in 2003 in the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. In Parker v. District of Columbia, six residents of the federal District of Columbia asked the court to block the implementation of three provisions of the district's Firearms Control Regulation Act (1975), which generally forbade the registration of handguns, forbade the carrying of unlicensed handguns or any other "deadly or dangerous" weapon that could be concealed, and demanded that legally stored firearms be disassembled or locked to prevent firing.
Know more about USA gun rights
brainly.com/question/3563382
#SPJ4