In Petty, Cacioppo, and Goldman's (1981) study, students were asked to read either eight weak arguments or eight strong argument

Question

3 years ago

14

In Petty, Cacioppo, and Goldman's (1981) study, students were asked to read either eight weak arguments or eight strong argument

s in support of implementing a comprehensive exam at their university. Some students were told that the exam would be initiated the following year, and others were told it would be initiated in ten years, well after the students' graduation. Finally, the researchers varied the expertise of the source of the arguments - that is, participants were told the arguments were generated either by a local high school class or by a prestigious "Commission on Higher Education." The researchers measured students' attitudes toward the exam. What was the main result of this study?
When students believed the exam would be implemented in ten years, the expertise of the source influenced their attitudes, but the quality of the arguments did not.

When students believed the exam would be implemented the following year, the expertise of the source influenced their attitudes, but the quality of the arguments did not.

When students believed the exam would be implemented in ten years, the quality of the arguments influenced their attitudes, but the expertise of the source did not.

When students believed the exam would be implemented the following year, both the expertise of the source and the quality of the arguments equally influenced their attitudes.

Social Studies

1 answer:

adelina 88 [10] · Answer 1 · 2022-05-22T15:34:42+03:00

The answer is: When students believed the exam would be implemented the following year, both the expertise of the source and the quality of the arguments equally influenced their attitudes.

This happen because the student's argument is extremely influenced by whether they could be involved in the comprehensive exam.

If the exam would be implemented in the following year, the students are very likely to face the exam themselves. This make them much more likely to have negative attitudes toward the idea.

If the exam would be implemented in the next 10 years, the students wouldn't have to face it. Therefore, their attitude would be less negative toward the comprehensive exam.