Answer:
I mean debate can encourage new laws but if you have one side wishing for laws and the other against it. It will usually slow legislation which is entirely the purpose. But it depends on what view are you taking it from because th end result can be no legislation at all or even a relaxation of legislation in fact that's happened in some states. So it depends on the view and narrative you wish to push. because it can be a semblance of all but B. If you're a centrist you'd probably say this debate will encourage new laws but the whole point of not wishing for infringements upon one's rights means no new laws. If you wanted new laws then this debate is a waste of time but you're angering a large portion of the population because you seek not to listen to the statistics and thereby information one may have that may dissuade from the legislation. And if you look at D it can be so. If 2 cannot agree then rights will not be infringed upon. Unless the side with more representatives that disagrees with the right then such laws will be enacted. Yes, they can place new restrictions and there you can make the case it's unconstitutional and etc because well there is ground and a foundation laid upon there. But as far as an actual thing it'd be A I suppose. But I'd question the teacher because it depends on how one views a division. It can be either cooperative relationships that can be mended or an all or nothing if it's not my way then we will have conflict and it shall erupt. It all depends.
Explanation:
<span>In Austria, Emperor Joseph II freed the serfs</span>
Hope this helps
_____________________________________
Politically: Lincoln tried preserving the Union, so the South decided to secede and this led to war.
• The most unfortunate political consequence of the Civil War was Abraham Lincoln's death.
- Lincoln also issued the Emancipation Proclamation. It went into effect on January 1, 1863, and declared, "that all persons held as slaves" in states that rebelled "are, and henceforward shall be free." the proclamation changed the focus of the war
Economic consequences:
- , the Southern economy was in ruins. Much of the war had been fought in the South
- foreign nations that once bought Southern cotton began to produce their own. As a result, post-war cotton prices plunged dramatically
- Just like in the South, a large percentage of Union soldiers went home with injuries that prevented them from working
- Buildings, railroad lines, and family farms destroyed in the war needed to be rebuilt. The nation as a whole needed to be reconstructed
Social consequences:
- The Civil War allowed African Americans to make progress in society.
- Following the Emancipation Proclamation, many free African Americans joined the Union army
- The population was reduced as a result of war casualties. Farms and homes had been destroyed.
Assuming the t or f stands for true or false, the answer would almost definitely be True.<span />
The movement is called Zionism, and its motive was to create a new Jewish national state in Palestine. In the Judaism religion, Palestine is considered to be their original homeland. Obviously, the supporters of this idea created this movement in an attempt to make this happen.
