In my opinion, he wasn't a very good leader.
1st of all, he was keeping people captive for rioting the streets. I think that wasn't right because it was his fault.
2nd, he turned his own country against him! What kind of leader does that?
3rd, many people died and got injured because of him. They all started fleeing.
4th, in the book Refugee by Alan Gratz, Isabel said that he let people escape to America. Well what about the Coast Guard? They would catch most Cubans anyway and send them back to Cuba. I feel like that was a mean joke.
Hope I helped ouo.
~Potato.
Copyright Potato 2019.
Answer:
The British and French tried to keep peace by allowing Hitler to take the Sudentenland region of Czechoslovakia.
Explanation:
This is basically Europe giving into Hitler to avoid war. They allowed this on a "promise" that he would cease aggressions.
Answer:
Kim Jong-un is a North Korean politician.He is the grandson of Kim Il-sung, who was the founder and first supreme leader of North Korea. He was born on/in January 8, 1984 . He is serving as Supreme Leader of North Korea. Since 2011 and the leader of the Workers' Party of Korea since 2012. He is a leader!
Explnation:He is a leader .
Answer:The French and Indian War began in 1754 and ended with the Treaty of Paris in 1763. The war provided Great Britain enormous territorial gains in North America, but disputes over subsequent frontier policy and paying the war's expenses led to colonial discontent, and ultimately to the American Revolution.
Explanation:
Answer:
1.was an enslaved African American man in the United States who unsuccessfully sued for his freedom and that of his wife and their two daughters in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case of 1857, popularly known as the "Dred Scott case 2.Dred Scott v. Sandford and The Court also ruled that Congress lacked power to ban slavery in the U.S. territories. 3.Scott sued his master's widow for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived as a resident of a free state and territory. He won his suit in a lower court, but the Missouri supreme court reversed the decision. 4.The Dred Scott decision was the Supreme Court's ruling on March 6, 1857, that having lived in a free state and territory did not entitle a slave, Dred Scott, to his freedom. In essence, the decision argued that as a slave Scott was not a citizen and could not sue in a federal cour
