1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Andrews [41]
3 years ago
7

How does one determine when a war is won or lost? what is the purpose of a treaty?

History
1 answer:
Inessa05 [86]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The purpose of a treaty is to officially end the state of war between the hostile parties.

You can win or lose a war in many ways. It depends on the time in history. A nation can surrender after enough losses, give the territories to the winner or the whole country in some cases. But capitulation is not the only way to win a war. You can lose every single part of land a country owns but continue to fight with your allies like Serbia did in World War 1. And Germany surrendered in World War 1 not by losing territory but by realizing that there is no way to win the war. And in World War 2 they were fighting until the end. Even after the capitulation, some soldiers kept fighting.

So to win a war you need the other side to surrender. Casualties, territory, and length of war do not mean victory or defeat, only when one party concedes defeat.

You might be interested in
Select four Germanic tribes.<br>Franks<br> Saxons <br>Angles <br>Celts <br>Vandals​
Agata [3.3K]

Answer:

The western German tribes consisted of the Marcomanni, Alamanni, Franks, Angles, and Saxons,

Explanation:

The western German tribes consisted of the Marcomanni, Alamanni, Franks, Angles, and Saxons, while the Eastern tribes north of the Danube consisted of the Vandals, Gepids, Ostrogoths, and Visigoths. The Alans, Burgundians, and Lombards are less easy to define.

6 0
3 years ago
NEED HELP ASAP :,)
EastWind [94]
I think it is C
Hope my answer help you?
3 0
3 years ago
What problems did the Roman expansion cause for the Republic
Dmitriy789 [7]

Answer:

The gap between the rich and the poor grew. Large wealthy landowners took over the "abandoned" farms of those serving in the military. These soldiers came back and found that they had no land. They were basically homeless. Without land, they had no basis for earning a living and no say in the government. Without farms to earn an income, these men could fall into debt. This could lead to becoming slaves of the landowners. When the next census was held, they might even lose their citizenship if they didn't own Roman property. Citizenship was an important factor in the government of the republic. Citizens were expected to perform certain civic duties, such as voting. Without citizenship, the people would lose their voice.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
What was the major argument against the Constitution by the Anti-Federalists and what was added to alleviate their fears?
Katen [24]

Answer:  Anti-Federalists argued that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government, which would diminish the rights of the states and of individuals.  The Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution to alleviate their fears.

Further detail:

The Anti-Federalists had opposed ratification of the US Constitution.  The Articles of Confederation, in place prior to the ratification of the Constitution of the United States of America, had granted stronger authority to the states.  Patrick Henry and other Anti-Federalists were concerned about too much power winding up in the hands of the federal government and its executive branch, thus allowing a small number of national elites to control the affairs of the USA.  They feared this also would diminish the rights and freedoms of individual citizens.

The Bill of Rights, laid out in the first ten amendments to the Constitution, provided some reassurance to Anti-Federalists after the fight over ratification, because these amendments to the Constitution served to guarantee that individuals' rights would be protected under federal law.

3 0
3 years ago
Which of these rulers is an example of an absolute monarch? A. A king who has the power to break any law he wants B. A king who
bearhunter [10]
I believe the answer is A
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • And secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity <br> I need help. plz help
    7·1 answer
  • How did the US government balance the need to ration food for military use during World War I with traditional civil liberties?
    13·1 answer
  • Why does Rogers oppose the use of public opinion polls?
    14·1 answer
  • How were concentration camps similar to extermination camps in Nazi Germany
    6·2 answers
  • 1) How many questions did the ballot ask voters to vote on?
    11·2 answers
  • How did nationalism and militarism contribute to conflicts among nations in Europe? in world war 1
    7·1 answer
  • Which options represent attempts on the part of the Mexican government to assert control over the Texas Territory? (Select all t
    7·2 answers
  • What was the name of the Jewish nationalist movement
    6·2 answers
  • Which major scientific invention originated during the Tang dynasty? A.gunpowder B.magnetic compass C.jade D.paper money
    7·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP NOW!!! which of the following has the right column chart. A. B. C. or D.??!!! please help i need the answer right no
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!