1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Akimi4 [234]
3 years ago
13

A 28-year-old single investor has funds saved at a bank. He contacts an RR and wants to begin allocating funds to a retirement a

ccount. What choices is the most appropriate asset allocation?
Business
1 answer:
Contact [7]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: a. 80% stocks, 20% bonds

Explanation:

Stocks are a better fit for young people for 2 reasons;

1. Younger people are usually more risk tolerant. This means that they can pick financial vehicles that are more reflective of this risk taking mentality such as Stocks.

2. As they are far from retirement, their main goal should be saving for retirement. Stocks offer a better chance as Capital Appreciation so that their investments will grow before they retire leaving them in a better position when they do.

Fixed income is more for the older generation so that they may be sure of stable income while they are in retirement.

At the same time, every portfolio should be diversified to avoid risk so 20% going to bonds is ideal.

You might be interested in
Venzuela Company’s net income for 2020 is $50,000. The only potentially dilutive securities outstanding were 1,000 options issue
aev [14]

Answer:

$4.67 per share

Explanation:

The calculation of the diluted earning per share is given below:

= (Total income - preference dividends) ÷ (outstanding shares + diluted shares)

where,

Total income is $50,000

Outstanding shares is 10,000

And, the diluted shares is computed by following calculations

Amount paid towards shares = Options issued × Exercise price per share

= 1,000 × $6

= $6,000

And,

Value of options = Amount paid towards shares ÷ Current market price

= $6,000 ÷ $20

= 300

Therefore,

Diluted shares is

= Options issued - value of options

= 1,000 - 300

= 700

So Diluted Earnings per share is

= ($50,000) ÷ (10,000 + 700)

= $4.67 per share

4 0
3 years ago
Define the following terms: a. Cost of debt b. Cost of equity c. After-tax WACC d. Equity beta e. Asset beta f. Pure-play compar
gtnhenbr [62]

Answer: The answers are explained below.

Explanation:

• Cost of debt: The cost of debt is the interest rate that a company is charged on its debts. It is the interest paid on bonds, loans etc. The cost of debt is usually the before-tax cost of a debt.

• Cost of equity: The cost of equity is the return a firm pays to its equity investors e.g shareholders in order to reward them for the risk taken by investing their capital. Companies need capital to operate and grow hence, individuals and organizations who provide funds to such companies are rewarded.

• After tax WACC: The Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) is a firm's combined cost of capital including preferred shares, common shares, and debt after the deduction of tax.

• Equity Beta: It measures the sensitivity of the stock price to changes in market. Equity Beta is also called levered beta.

• Asset beta: It is the beta of a firm without the effect of debt. It is a company's volatility of returns without its indebtedness.

• Pure play comparable: The pure play comparable is the taking of the beta estimate of another company that is comparable and in same line of business.

• Certainty equivalent: It is the guaranteed return that an individual would take now, rather than awaiting a higher but uncertain return later in the future.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the screening effect?
Vlada [557]

Answer:

it's the theory that the completion of college indicates do employers that a job applicant is intelligent and hard-working

4 0
3 years ago
Presented below are two independent cases related to available-for-sale debt investments. Case 1 Case 2 Amortized cost $41,640 $
netineya [11]

Answer:

Case 1 = $9,420

Case 2 = 0

Explanation:

Determining the amount of impairment loss is given below:-

Case 1

Impairment loss = Amortized cost - Fair value

= $41,640 - $32,220

= $9,420

Case 2

Impairment loss = Amortized cost - Fair value

= 91,800 - $102,220

= 0

Since, the fair value is higher than Amortized cost so the value of Impairment loss in case 2 is 0.

5 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP FAST!!!
maria [59]
It’s C because it’s balanced
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Greg, the president of an it company, is friends with jack, the ceo of hypertech, a company that develops and manufactures compu
    8·1 answer
  • 24. You have saved $4,000 for a down payment on a new car. The largest monthly payment you can afford is $350. The loan will hav
    6·1 answer
  • External costs are A. borne by the public but incurred by the government. B. borne by the government but incurred by the public.
    6·1 answer
  • Perez, in recently completed 56,000 units of a product that was expected to consume four pounds of direct material per finished
    10·1 answer
  • The action of using a mouse to drag a selection from its original location and drop it in a new location
    7·1 answer
  • Regarding risk levels, financial managers should
    13·1 answer
  • Stanford owns and operates two dry cleaning businesses. He travels to Boston to discuss acquiring a restaurant. Later in the mon
    14·1 answer
  • Being in short supply is what?
    6·1 answer
  • In the short run, a purely competitive seller will shut down if Multiple Choice it cannot produce at an economic profit. there i
    12·1 answer
  • he income statement columns in the end-of-period spreadsheet show that debits are equal to $26,754 and credits are $68,142. what
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!