The correct answer to this open question is the following.
In the case of Chiafalo v. Washington (2020), the Supreme Court ruled that it is constitutional for states to place restrictions on who electors can vote for.
I agree with this decision because voting in the Electoral College is a serious thing, and members of the college have to assume this important and serious role. That is why they are members of the Electoral College and expressed their intention to vote for the candidate they supported.
I think there would be no room for faithless electors in the US Electoral College. There is no reason for them to vote for other people if they originally pledge to vote for their candidates.
On July 6, 2020, the case of Chiafalo v. Washington was decided.
the white man only wanted one race and thought the natives were a less dominate race.
Explanation:
I learned it back in 7th grade.
Answer
The answer is ziggurat.
A ziggurat is a Mesopotamian temple and were generally very large, showing off genuine Mesopotamian architecture.
A mud-brick house isn't exactly monumental, a stela is a slab of stone, and a seed plow is a farming tool.
