The policies of the winning and losing powers in Europe and the Us were resultant in the second world war.
Explanation:
After the first world war there was an undercurrent of dictatorship and fascism in many countries that was on the rise but the winners of the war did not much care for it.
They were taking up a policy of suspension and of appeasement to quell the desire of the Germans and the Italians but that was not to happen as diplomacy failed.
The harsh treaty of Versailles had made it hard for the losing sides not to harbor resentment and it burst open in another animosity and war
Answer:
1. It Is a clear expression of fake democracy. The term "free election" doesn't entirely make sense in a country where any distinction between the ruling party and the government has been almost completely erased. Syria is considered a unitary republic with a semi-presidential style of government. However, the controlling parties practice a highly authoritarian regime with most of the political power in the AL-Assad family's hands. People doesn't have more option if the want to "live".
2. If I live in that country, I think I feel like a hostage. Elections over there aren't free, and they're certainly not fair. The resulting optics are not democratic enough. They buy the government a minimum of democratic credibility abroad without seriously imperiling its hold on power.
Explanation:
Answer:
Autocracy
Explanation:
An absolute monarch has 100% control over their region so it's more like an autocracy.
Answer:
A conclusion for this passage could be:
The rapid and paramount political and cultural changes that were brought by the Renaissance and the Reformation would not have been possible without the Printing Press, because such political and cultural change required a more literate and cultured society, something that only became possible after the printing press was invented.
