1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bearhunter [10]
3 years ago
14

An argument is invalid if and only if _____________. (Points : 1)

English
1 answer:
tangare [24]3 years ago
4 0
An argument is invalid if and only if all the premises is true and the conclusion is false.

We can test the invalidity of the argument by assuming all the premises are true and seeing whether it is possible for the conclusion to be false. If the conclusion is possible to be false, then, the argument is invalid.

A valid argument, on the other hand, is valid if and only if it is necessary that:
1) if all of the premises are true, then the conclusion is true
2) if all of the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true
3) it is impossible that all the premises are true and the conclusion is false.
You might be interested in
Which specific detail explains why regulations for
sladkih [1.3K]

Answer:

I think its the second one

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Hi can anybody please help me make sure my answers are right. thank you.
Marina86 [1]

im sure positive it is correct


4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does the information in both passages support the idea that the new women mentioned deserve recognitio?
Jobisdone [24]
So they can deserve recognito
5 0
3 years ago
In at least one hundred words, explain what the word dichotomy means and how it relates to Nelson Mandela’s “Nobel Prize Accepta
Amanda [17]

Answer:

Dichotomy is defined as "a division or contrast between two things that are or are represented as being opposed or entirely different."

Mandela's speech uses dichotomy to emphasize his points as evident in the following excerpt: "We speak here of the challenge of the dichotomies of war and peace, violence and non-violence, racism and human dignity, oppression and repression and liberty and human rights, poverty and freedom from want."

The contrasts mentioned in the speech are: war vs. peace; violence vs. non-violence; racism vs. human dignity; oppression and repression vs. liberty and human rights; and poverty vs. freedom from want. The pairs are negative in opposition to the positive experiences or conditions of human existence.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Why was Eliezer separated from his mother and sisters at Auschwitz?
Brums [2.3K]

Answer:

because he is male and she is female

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • You cant see me yet i can touch you i can be gentle and destructive on the same day what am i answer
    12·1 answer
  • What is a very stressful thing
    13·2 answers
  • Describe how sound effects are used and/or created to build tension in a movie or play.
    10·1 answer
  • Which two statements best explain the author's purpose for writing the passage?
    7·1 answer
  • Which of these details did you include in your<br> explanation? Check any that apply.
    7·1 answer
  • People by me to eat but never eat me what am I ?
    13·2 answers
  • Which verb agrees with the subject in the sentence?
    11·1 answer
  • Which is the closest antonym for the word retrieved?
    8·1 answer
  • Identify the correct sentence. I'm not surprised she's bored, all she does is watch television
    13·1 answer
  • Need help I would really appreciate it
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!