Answer:
all are correct answer ok
Answer:
For one it could be seen as undemocratic, For example if a candidate loses the popular vote, the electoral college could still let that candidate in even if they lose the popular election. It also has a winner-takes-all approach which cancels the votes of the losing candidates in each state.
Explanation:
The answer is most likely c.
They were different, because in Thinker's case it was ruled in the favor of the students. They had the freedom to publish whatever they wanted, as long as it was not disruptive . In Hazelwood's case it was ruled in favor of the school, because the educators had a power to decide what could be published in student's newspaper.
