'Fair' is really subjective, anyone will have their own opionion.
But i think the best way to define fair is if the tax structure give the same amount of weight throughout all economic classes
If i can replace the federal income tax structure, i would just give a straight percentage of amount to all economic classes, without anyway to cut with 'tax deductible tricks', like 20 % of annual income to all classes of economy. I
Answer:
i will take at lease 3 years to get 425,845
A antonym for delicate could be firm
The type of overhead costing system that would be the best fit for Lunker is: Traditional costing system using design hours as the basis for allocation.
<h3>What is the Traditional Costing System?</h3>
The traditional costing system is a method applied in accounting that aims at determining the cost of production. One driver is assigned as the basis of allocation.
In the case of Lunker Lures above, the driver that is used as the basis of allocation should be design hours.
Learn more about the Traditional Costing System here:
brainly.com/question/24516871
Answer:
No
Explanation:
An investment that "promises" a 44 percent annual return is most likely a scam, because even the riskiest stocks rarely yield annual returns higher than 10% of the initial investment.
Besides, the option is described as very complicated, and you as a potential investor do not understand it well, which is a very difficult position to be in because it could even lead you to being scammed without realizing.
