What does it mean to say that a country’s birth rate is increasing? How would this change a country’s population? Explain your a
nswer in at least two or three sentences
2 answers:
Answer:
This means that population is increasing in younger people. This means there would be a lot of those people. Think of the population pyramid, and how, lets say, that there are more 30-50 age people then 50-100 or 0-30. This really means if the birth rate increases, that there will be more population, and more population of that age.
Here's an example that's somewhat close to my answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
Women in the American Revolution played various roles depending on their social status (in which race was a factor) and their political views.
The American Revolutionary War took place after Great Britain put in place the seven Coercive, or Intolerable Acts, in the colonies.
Americans responded by forming the Continental Congress and going to war with the British. The war would not have been able to progress as it did without the widespread ideological, as well as material, support of both male and female inhabitants of the colonies. While formal politics did not include women, ordinary domestic behaviors became charged with political significance as women confronted the Revolution. Halting previously everyday activities, such as drinking British tea or ordering clothes from Britain, demonstrated Colonial opposition during the years leading up to and during the war.
Although the war raised the question of whether or not a woman could be a patriot, women across separate colonies demonstrated that they could. Support was mainly expressed through traditional female occupations in the home, the domestic economy, and their husbands' and fathers' businesses. Women participated by boycotting British goods, producing goods for soldiers, spying on the British, and serving in the armed forces disguised as men.
The war also affected the lives of women who remained loyal to the crown, or those who remained politically neutral; in many cases, the impact was devastating.
Answer:
Changes were occurring too rapidly.
<h2>Why did the Soviet Union collapse?</h2>
The Soviet Union lost all its money.
By 1991, it was unable to continue operating its massive military-industrial complex alongside its civil economy, which provides people with food and shelter. For the first time since World War II, the Kremlin had to decide.
Stalin and Lenin would have gone into the armed forces. They would have put an end to the uprising by engaging in an unprecedented bloodbath and strangling of the populace. In the 1990s, the North Korean Kim family tried it and it was successful.
Gorbachev and company were not in the mood to slaughter people. They stopped funding the military. For that, mankind awarded Gorbachev the Nobel Prize, and the whole Russian people—apart from certain trash like myself—have hated him forever.
The military-industrial complex, which makes up at least half of the economy, came to a grinding halt; entire regions shut down; troops went hungry; and the effects spread all the way to Moscow.
Then the major event that you are familiar with from history books occurred.
The USSR was an empire of communists made up of many ethnic republics. The ethnic elites didn't see any need to submit to Moscow when the funding from Moscow dried up and the terrifying Soviet apparatus of oppression and control ran out of fuel.
The fifteen republics all took different paths. The USSR experiment had come to an end.
The evolution of Soviet gold reserves during the course of Soviet rule is seen below. Gold exports and reserves, in metric tons. The gold exports seen in the red line below were mostly used to purchase food in the West.
