Answer:
Los hunos, un pueblo procedente de las estepas del Asia Central, posiblemente de origen prototúrquico, aunque existen versiones de que se trataba de un pueblo iranio, invaden territorios de la Europa Oriental y parte de la Europa Central, desplazando a pueblos germánicos tales como los godos o los francos hacia el decadente Imperio Romano de Occidente, al cual le haría frecuentes saqueos y campañas violentas durante la primera mitad del siglo V.
Explanation:
Los hunos, un pueblo procedente de las estepas del Asia Central, posiblemente de origen prototúrquico, aunque existen versiones de que se trataba de un pueblo iranio, invaden territorios de la Europa Oriental y parte de la Europa Central, desplazando a pueblos germánicos tales como los godos o los francos hacia el decadente Imperio Romano de Occidente, al cual le haría frecuentes saqueos y campañas violentas durante la primera mitad del siglo V.
I'm going to say (c) Governor Berkeley tried to raise a Militia to fight American Indians
Answer:
Europeans explored and claimed that more and more land was there. They had to make relations with people who were already in the Americas and try to find a way to conquer them and claim that land theirs.
hope this helps and feel free to add brainiest
<u>This portion of the text emphasizes the natural rights of people:</u>
- <em>Man being born ... with a title to perfect freedom and an uncontrolled enjoyment of all the rights and privileges of the law of Nature ... hath by nature a power not only to preserve his property— that is, his life, liberty, and estate, against the injuries and attempts of other men</em>
Explanation:
Enlightenment thinkers like John Locke believed that using reason will guide us to the best ways to operate in order to create the most beneficial conditions for society. For Locke, this included a conviction that all human beings have certain natural rights which are to be protected and preserved. Locke's ideal was one that promoted individual freedom and equal rights and opportunity for all. Each individual's well-being (life, health, liberty, possessions) should be served by the way government and society are arranged.
Here's another excerpt section from Locke's <em> Second Treatise on Civil Government</em> (1690), in which he expresses the ideas of natural rights:
- <em>The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges every one: and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind, who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions… (and) when his own preservation comes not in competition, ought he, as much as he can, to preserve the rest of mankind, and may not, unless it be to do justice on an offender, take away, or impair the life, or what tends to the preservation of the life, the liberty, health, limb, or goods of another.</em>
