Answer:
16
Step-by-step explanation:
64=1,2,4,8,<u>16</u>,32,64
48=1,2,3,4,6,8,12,<u>16</u>,24,48
Answer:
s(r(2)) = 6
Step-by-step explanation:
You would first solve for r(2). You then input r(2) which equals -2 into s(r(2)).
r(x)= -2x + 2
r(2)= -2(2) + 2
r(2)= -4 +2
r(2)= -2
s(x)=x² + 2
s(r(2)) = (-2)² +2
s(r(2)) = 6
Answer:
Yes, there is evidence to support that claim that instructor 1 is more effective than instructor 2
Step-by-step explanation:
We can conduct a hypothesis test for the difference of 2 proportions. If there is no difference in instructor quality, then the difference in proportions will be zero. That makes the null hypothesis
H0: p1 - p2 = 0
The question is asking whether instructor 1 is more effective, so if he is, his proportion will be larger than instructor 2, so the difference would result in a positive number. This makes the alternate hypothesis
Ha: p1 - p2 > 0
This is a right tailed test (the > or < sign always point to the critical region like an arrowhead)
We will use a significance level of 95% to conduct our test. This makes the critical values for our test statistic: z > 1.645.
If our test statistic falls in this region, we will reject the null hypothesis.
<u>See the attached photo for the hypothesis test and conclusion</u>
Answer:
It represents 3x20 +3x15
Step-by-step explanation: