How does the u.s. economy differ from pure capitalism

History

1 answer:

elixir [45]3 years ago

6 0

Almost 20% of the United States GDP is actually made up of Government Spending.

Contrary to popular belief the United States is NOT an example of a pure capitalist state.

The government intervenes quite often to provide schools, food banks, hospitals, universities, roads and even bails out banks and large corporations. The government even has anti-competition and anti-monopoly laws.

A pure capitalist state would mean even lower intervention by the Government and a free hand of Demand and Supply.

You might be interested in

Please help ill give brainly <33 (no links or ill report u )

Verdich [7]

Answer:

C) Sectionalism

Explanation:

In this quote, Washington is referring to the split of political parties along state and territorial/regional lines. Sectionalism is the term used to identify people's alliances more with their specific region/party/area more rather than the nation as a whole. Thus, C is the best choice here.

7 0

2 years ago

What are 4 cities that became major port cities

Dvinal [7]

In the United States on the East Coast- New York, Boston, Charleston, Norfolk.

8 0

3 years ago

During the Bronze Age, farmers were more easily able to trade surplus goods because of which technological advancement?

Zarrin [17]

I believe it's metal plows

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

WILL MARK BRAINLESS!!! The Gettysburg Address is a remarkable speech. It is only 272 words long and took only two minutes to del

xxMikexx [17]

Both speeches focus on the history of fighting for a cause leading up to the Civil War. The US was built on revolutionary spirit and men's lives lost for the bigger idea of freedom. The deaths of the men will mean something because the cause of the war means something.

These addresses revitalized the Union effort and reminded the men of the long history they were now a part of. They stand on the side of freedom and that will be meaningful. This dedicate brought up morale in Union forces.

5 0

3 years ago

To what extent was asserting neutrality for Wilson similar the asserting neutrality for Jefferson and Madison? Cite two specific

miv72 [106K]

Answer:

Split US allegiance--During World War I, the US people were split on who to help and the same was true for Jefferson and Madison during the Napoleonic Wars between Britain and France.

Jefferson and Madison attempted to remain neutral in the conflict between Britain and France during the Napoleonic Wars because NE had a trade relationship with Britain but many believed the US owed an alliance to France after they helped during the Revolution.

Wilson faced a similar issue as immigration had created a diverse US population with support on both sides of World War I. Creating an alliance with either side could split the country and create problems within the US.

7 0

3 years ago