Personally, I don't think so.
Every information we have is by principle, biased. We can never have a full picture on the issue (we don't live long enough to have ALL the information and all the other people's opinions) so this means that we only know a selection of relevant information. This selection biases our perception of the issue: so in this way, I think that we are bound to be at least a little bit biased.
Andrew Jackson's belived that there were strict limits to the federal government's authority under the Constitution.
The Missouri Compromise did the following:
1) Officially made Maine a state in the US. This would be a state that does not allow slavery.
2)Officially made Missouri a state in the US. This would be a state that allows slavery.
3) Establishes the 36'30 line. This latitude/longitude line separated free and slave states/territories. Any state north of this line would NOT allow slavery. Any state south of this line would allow for slavery.
This compromise was in created in huge part due to Henry Clay and helped to temporarily solve the issue of slavery in new territories acquired by the US.
You can use this information to help you answer the question since you did not include the answer choices.
