Answer:
The argument in favor of social media use is the stronger argument. The article claims that students do better in school when they use social media. The author gives anecdotal evidence that students use social media to discuss classwork, then uses empirical evidence to show that grades went up in a study where students used social media. The argument against social media is weak because it lacks specific evidence. The writer uses the rhetorical device of parallelism to list a variety of ill effects of social media use. However, the writer never offers any evidence for these negative effects. This writer uses the bandwagon fallacy by telling the audience that most people who want to do well do not use social media.
Explanation:
i just answered this and this is edg. sample response
The parents love laxmi, if this many words taken out for the active voice isn't sustainable, and you only need to know how to do an active voice...it's simply the passive voice in reverse. So for an active voice it would be the doer of the action, followed by the action, to the receiver of the action
Answer:
Please help me with the homework later
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
A and C have awkward sentence structure because "when a car needs many serious repairs, it might be cheaper to buy a new car", it repeats the word car again making it redundant and in C, "When a car had needed many serious repairs, it might be cheaper to buy a new one", it has wrong use of past-tense.