Answer:
Lubrication
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that this is an example of the business term known as Lubrication. This is a form of bribery where an individual or company gives a certain amount of money (usually a relatively small amount) to personnel of a business in order to speed up a certain tasks and facilitate the process that needs to be completed. Which is what is happening in this situation, the company gave $500 to the customs officials to clear the containers faster.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Explanation:
Organizational culture is characterized as a set of values that is shared by all employees at all organizational levels.
Therefore, culture is a determining factor for the elaboration and compliance with organizational rules and norms.
For an organizational label to be correctly incorporated, it is necessary to take into account essentially the organizational culture, the way relationships develop within the organization, how hierarchization occurs, the interaction between teams, what are the core values of the organization. company and other variables that compose it.
Ideally, organizational identity should be taken into account, all values respected and ethical principles maintained so that the organizational flow occurs properly.
Answer:
The disallowed loss may be used to offset gain on the subsequent sale
Explanation:
A recognized gain or loss is simply refered to as the gains or losses that increase or decrease the gross income of taxpayers.
The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) §267 had laid out rules guiding or relations to the deductions of either losses or expenses between 2 or more related parties.
The related-party loss disallowance rules states that tax laws significantly treat parties involved as though they are the same taxpayer and does not allow recognition of losses on sales to related parties and it may be able to forthrightly deduct the disallowed loss by selling the property to an unrelated third party at a gain and also oonly if the related buyer sells the property at a gain(the related-party buyer sells it for more than she purchased it for).
On the condition that the related-party buyer sells the property for less than her purchase price from the related seller, then disallowed loss expires unused.
<span>b. $16,400........ would be your answer</span>
Answer & Explanation:
(a) Cost of Eliminating 2 Pollution Units
Firm X 215
Firm Y 1250
Firm Z 180
As mentioned in the question:
Company Y has excessive pollution-discount charges, it thinks it is probably better off shopping for a permit from firm Z and a allow from company X, so that it doesn't need to reduce its very own pollutants emissions. At which of the following expenses is firm Z inclined to sell one among its lets in to company Y, however firm X is not? We'll take a look at all that follow within the listing beneath.
$90
$178
$186
$451
$529
To cover its own costs, X needs to receive $200 but Z needs only $150. That means Z would sell for $178 or $186, but X would not.
Firm Initial Pollution Permit Allocation Action
Firm X 2 d. sell one permit for $326
Firm Y 2 b. buy two permits for $326 each
Firm Z 2 d. sell one permit for $326
Firm Final Amount of Pollution Eliminate Cost of pollution reduction
Firm X 3 $415
Firm Y 0
Firm Z 3 $330
Proposed method Total cost of Eliminating 6 units of pollution (dollars)
Regulation $215 + $1250 + $180 = $1645
Tradable permits $415 + $326 x 2 + $330 = $1397
In this situation, it may be concluded that doing away with pollutants is greater high priced to society while the authorities regulates each company to dispose of a certain quantity of pollution than while it allocates pollution permits that can be sold and bought. The trade able permits variety may be decreased even in addition if you took the view that the $326 paid to X and Z from Y were used to offset their expenses. In that case the final number could be simply $745 - $652 = $93.
Hope the Answer Helps :)