Answer:
1. $3,59,666.66
2. $4,10,066.66
Explanation:
1. The computation of value of firm is shown below:-
As the Earning before interest and tax given remains the same, this impact that there is no growth rate in the earnings to consider.
= Earning before interest and tax × (1 - Tax) ÷ Cost of equity
= $83,000 × (1 - 0.35) ÷ (0.15)
= $53,950 ÷ 0.15
= $3,59,666.66
2. The computation of value of levered firm is shown below:-
Value of unlevered firm + Debt × Tax rate
= 3,59,666.66 + ($144,000 × 35%)
= $4,10,066.66
Answer:
the answer is D. convenience products
Explanation:
convenient products are much cheaper and consumers usually look for them by the brand, or sometimes, these products are homogenous in nature, so people would just go and buy it rather than comparing different products and prices.
Answer:
11.56%
Explanation:
The computation of the minimum required rate of return is shown below:
Residual income = Net operating income - (Average operating assets × minimum required rate of return)
$22,000 = $59,000 - ($320,000 × minimum required rate of return)
After solving this the minimum required rate of return is 11.56%
By applying the above formula we can find out the minimum required rate of return
Answer:
c. remuneration of personnel
Explanation:
Henri Fayol developed the fourteen principles of management.
One of the fourteen principles being, Remuneration of personnel.
Fayol was of the opinion that in order to extract the best performance from employees, appropriate remuneration system must exist in an organization.
This meant emphasizing on employee satisfaction by following fair remuneration practices coupled with adequate incentive system which rewards good performance.
In the given case, the pharmaceutical company offers performance based incentives in the form of quarterly as well as annual bonuses in addition to an existing profit-sharing plan for employees. This is an example of Fayol's principle of Remuneration of personnel.
Answer:
Check the following explanation.
Explanation:
The goals of managers and shareholders are not always aligned. Agency theory suggests this misalignment creates the need for costly monitoring through compensation contracts.
To align the goals of the two parties,compensation contracts should be designed to motivate the executive to make decisions that will not only increase his or her wealth, but will also increase shareholder wealth. Steps taken to increase shareholder wealth should be reflected in improved firm performance.Including both components in the contracts helps ensure the decisions of the executive are linked to various time horizons.
Shortterm components motivate the executive to make decisions that have an immediate affect on the firm. Long-term components are necessary to lengthen the decision horizon of the executive and enhance the likelihood of continued improvement in firm value. The long-term incentives in these contracts can be based on improved shareholder wealth as well as improved firm performance.
