A.) the French were less interested in occupying territories
Answer:
No
Explanation:
Firstly, heavier NATO involvement in Crimea would escalate the current crisis. Shifting the focus of the confrontation from Ukraine-Russia to US-Russia would tie Putin’s hands, and virtually disable him from backing down. The strong support he received from Russia’s Parliament, along with the approval for use of the armed forces, should be seen not only as a proof of his personal strength in Russia, but also a limitation on his room for maneuver. If confronted by a NATO intervention, he would have no choice but to respond by escalating. A further hardening of Russia’s position would generate the potential for spillover in other states that Russia considers within its sphere of interest. Thus, overly aggressive NATO moves in reaction to Moscow’s moves could have a negative impact on developments relating to Transnistria, South Ossetia and Abkhazia.
source:https://www.boulevard-exterieur.com/Why-NATO-should-not-move-on-Crimea.html
<span>Two of the tangible and/or intangible ways in
which state governments improve society is are the following: frstly, imposing
a law for the citizens to abide in (intangible). In this way then, one who
disobeys, gets punishment with due process (tangible). </span>
Answer: the correct answer is Louis XVI of France's grandson , Phillip, was placed on the French throne with the agreement that the French and Spanish thrones would never be united.
Explanation:
Charles II of Spain named Philip of France as his succesor before dying.
Actually, the treaties allowed Philip to take the Spanish throne but he had to resign his claim to the French throne.
<span>I would say. Canasatego admonition and other evidence has led some scholars to believe that Native American, particularly Iroquois, governments served as models for the new nation’s government.</span>
