All categories

3 years ago

Which title best completes the partial outline below ideas from the american revolution spread

History

1 answer:

aleksandrvk [35]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

The policy in times of change crosses and surrounds different areas, the square, the streets that the circumscribed, the central institutions like the Cabildo or the sessions of the National Constituent Assemblies, the spaces that open the periodic press, but also the family gatherings, the cafes and the surroundings of the theater, the different services provided in the military contingents. While all that history (although not all),

but in some of those power environments, it has a serious and decisive turning point in the hectic days of the English invasions, it becomes highly visible and audible after the May Revolution of 1810: agitating priests, men of the church holding positions in the National Assemblies, in the drafting of press organs, churches converted into the place of political meeting, of deliberative assemblies.

The overwhelming evidence does not admit implications.1 The question of whether the priests involved in the policy does not matter. And he doesn't have it because it is obvious that they did. A historians specialized in the religious world are not interested then find out

Whether or not they participate in the revolutionary phenomenon. What is really more appropriate is Try to understand that process. If we leave aside the apologetic perspectives that abound in these cases, where in the middle of the scene it can be clearly found a drama and several heroes or antiheroes, and, where, finally, there is no interpretation but Excessively positive or negative ratings, two looks deserve to stand out.

One of the most popular interpretations is the so-called politicization of the clergy.

From this assumption, the scene appears divided, to the extent that it is believed that by a On this subject you can consult with great utility Di Stefano Fabián Herrero

On the one hand there is a fact, the revolution, and on the other hand, a church that can opt for strategies that refer to accession and support, or to others that they prefer instead the questioning and the combat. We are in the presence of actors who arrive at the time revolutionary have to opt. The hypothesis is based, then, on that contingent of Church men who participate in one way or another in the new world that opens the

revolutionary phenomenon.

You might be interested in

If a police officer wanted to search someone’s home and the homeowner refused, which of the following would the police officer n

Viktor [21]

The police officer would need to have a search warrant. A search warrant is a court order that a magistrate, judge or Supreme Court official issues to authorize law enforcement officers to conduct a search of a person, location or vehicle for evidence of a crime and to confiscate any evidence they find. However, police officers generally do not need a search warrant to search someone's body for a gun or other illegal paraphernalia.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

History question down below

Sonja [21]

I know the 2nd and the 3rd one are correct.

5 0

3 years ago

(HC)Both the Montgomery Bus Boycott and the Freedom Rides were successful in that they resulted in the integration of transporta

Likurg_2 [28]

Answer:

Option B

Explanation:

Complete Question:

Both the Montgomery Bus Boycott and the Freedom Rides were successful in that they resulted in the integration of transportation. What was the difference in the way the successful outcomes were achieved

A. The Freedom Rides were successful despite having no central organization involved in the planning; the Montgomery Bus Boycott was supported by the NAACP.

B. The Freedom Rides succeeded due to federal intervention; the Montgomery Boycott succeeded due to local economic pressure.

C. The success of the Freedom Rides did not require the intervention of law enforcement; the Montgomery Bus Boycott involved local police.

D. The success of the Freedom Rides was due to the support of the American public, the success of the Montgomery Bus Boycott stemmed from international pressure.

The Montgomery Bus Boycott started due to Rosa Parks a black woman been arrested after she refused to give up her seat so that a white passenger could sit in it in Montgomery, Alabama. The Montgomery Bus Boycott was instigated against the policy of racial segregation on the public transit system of transportation. As a result of the boycott, Montgomery City Lines <u>suffered financially</u> by losing between 30,000 and 40,000 bus fares each day for a period of) 381 days(from December 5, 1955, to December 20. 1956, the bus boycott ended successfully after the Supreme Court upheld the district court's ruling that segregation on public buses and transportation was against the law.

The Freedom Rides was a political protest in 1961 by civil rights activists as a result of non-enforcement of the United States Supreme Court decisions which ruled that segregated public buses were unconstitutional. The ride was carried out by seven blacks and six whites left Washington, D.C into the segregated Southern United States which leads more than 400 volunteers who traveled towards the Southern United States after the first set of the freedom ride passengers were assaulted. The Riders were <u>successful in convincing the Federal Government</u> to enforce Supreme Court decisions.

6 0

3 years ago

How many characteristics does the FBI use to compare hair?

LUCKY_DIMON [66]

Answer:

I think in the 10millions

5 0

3 years ago

What do you think happened to people who were conquored or colonized in south africa

Svetlanka [38]

Answer:

1.How did colonialism affect South Africa?

2.What effect did colonization have?

3.What are the positive and negative effects of colonialism?

4.What are the disadvantages of colonialism?

5.What major problems did colonialism?

6.What are the impacts of colonialism on Africa?

7.Did imperialism in Africa have more positive or negative effects?

Explanation:

1.With colonialism, which began in South Africa in 1652, came the Slavery and Forced Labour Model. ... Some resisted the forces of colonial intrusion, slavery and forced labour for extended periods. Others, however, such as the Khoikhoi communities of the south-western Cape, disintegrated within a matter of decades.

2.As Europeans moved beyond exploration and into colonization of the Americas, they brought changes to virtually every aspect of the land and its people, from trade and hunting to warfare and personal property. European goods, ideas, and diseases shaped the changing continent

3.Colonial powers introduced Western schools and healthcare, resources that often had a positive effect on the lives of the colonized people. ... While the colonizers did bring positive improvements and advancements, the inhabitants often lacked immunity to the pathogens the colonizers also brought from their home countries.

4.Unfamiliar system of government: the colonial masters brought new and alien systems of government which the natives were not familiar with. These systems of government gave less importance to, and had less regard for the systems of government of the colonies.

5.Colonialism's impacts include environmental degradation, the spread of disease, economic instability, ethnic rivalries, and human rights violations—issues that can long outlast one group's colonial rule

6.Another important impact of colonialism in Africa is the disarticulation of their economy. Colonialism distorted African pattern of economic development in many different ways. There was disarticulation in production of goods, markets, traders, transport, provision of social amenities and pattern of urbanization etc.

7.Politically, imperialism in Africa has generally had a positive effect, providing models (infrastructure) for government that would continue even after the African nations began to govern themselves.

I hope this helps you

5 0

3 years ago