1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
8_murik_8 [283]
3 years ago
10

EVALUATING Which do you think was a more effective strategy—violence or nonviolence—for eliminating slavery? Why? Think About: •

Frederick Douglass • Nat Turner • William Lloyd Garrison • Sojourner Truth
History
1 answer:
gogolik [260]3 years ago
4 0

After taking into consideration this important historical figures such as Nat Turner, Frederick Douglass, William Lloyd Garrison and Sojourner Truth I had come to the conclusion that neither violence or nonviolence are a way to eliminate slavery effectively. I think both extremes aren't useful because they are extremes. It is evident that through violence you can't get to eliminate slavery in the USA, but this doesn't mean that making a revolt, organizing a protest and many more active ways of showing disapproval are wrong. These events are needed in order to show the society that slavery is wrong, it's not natural neither ethical and needs to have an end. I think there needs to be a balance between violence and nonviolence. You can raise your voice and make it be heard, you can make a revolt and make the wealthy and powerful hear the oppressed, you can publish books about slavery stories and abuses, you can publish news or opinions on a local newspaper and many active ways of making your voice be heard. You don't have to be impartial about this injustice and calm, sometimes a little bit of rudeness, toughness, and resistance are needed to face social problems such as slavery. Frederick Douglass and Sojourner Thruth are good examples of effective abolitionsts and activist of slavery beacuse they were heard, they actively protest against slavery without having to be violent but not being kind and polite either. They were some of the fighters who lead the path to abolish slavery in the USA.

You might be interested in
DO you think Wilson was right? Why or why not
Rzqust [24]
Wilson who????????!!
7 0
3 years ago
Why do you think so many Indians disapproved of British rule in India in the late 19 century
valentinak56 [21]

Answer:

Indians disapproved of British rule in India in the late 19th century because

1. Exploitation

2. Destruction of local industries.

3. Deforestation

4. Feminine

5. Factories goods took place of hand made products.

Explanation: I know its not the best answer but I hope this helps pls leave me a like ; )

6 0
2 years ago
In 2015, about ____________ percent of mothers of children under age 15 in married-couple families were stay-at-home mothers, wi
patriot [66]

The correct answer to this open question is the following-

In 2015, about 26 percent of mothers of children under age 15 in married-couple families were stay-at-home mothers, wives of steadily employed men, who were temporarily out of the labor force for the entire year to "take care of home and family."

Many women that have children make the difficult decision to quit their jobs in order to raise their children. Their priority is to raise, protect, and take care of their children meanwhile the father works to provide what is needed. Sometimes, corporations favored or pay more to women that are not mothers. Some studies have shown that women that are not mothers earn 5% to 6% more than mothers.

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following does NOT describe America following the abolition of slavery? Question 1 options: African Americans were
Sergio039 [100]

I would say the answer is D., sadly. African Americans did not receive equal pay as whites did.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Mark the consequence if it is intentional. A. Europeans take corn to Africa. Corn becomes an important crop there. B. Some sailo
Maurinko [17]
The one option that describes an intentional action would be "E<span>uropeans take corn to Africa. Corn becomes an important crop there," since the Europeans needed a sustainable crop for survival and profit. </span>
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which innovation most strongly caused the emergence of a nationwide market for farm produce in England?
    7·2 answers
  • What was significant about the drafting of France’s first constitution? A. It put into practice the concepts of constitutional m
    5·1 answer
  • Arguably one of the most important inventions of the 20th century was A) the transistor. B) air conditioning. C) the vacuum clea
    13·1 answer
  • What did fertile soil mostly contribute to the Mesopotamians' trade with other civilizations?
    12·1 answer
  • As a result of the war, Saddam Hussein no longer held power in Iraq.<br> a. True<br> b. False
    7·2 answers
  • Thomas Edison’s fascination with what invention inspired him to develop the phonograph?
    11·2 answers
  • (HELP ME WITH THIS PLEASE IF YOU WANT BRAINLISTS) For each Amendment you write what each sentence talk about please i need it AS
    5·1 answer
  • What might have happened if they didn't agree to the Mayflower Compact?
    12·1 answer
  • When did voter suppression become an issue in the United States?
    15·1 answer
  • 5) Name any two Indian tribes that lived along that river?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!