<em>Banksys' plan to sell anything as "art" is pure genius, as Banksy is a firm believer in not placing a price on art. Therefore his act was out of art, not vandalism because he was trying to get his point across the board. Although he didn't make his point clear due to the art selling for even more after self-destructing. Banksy makes street art and putting a price on his art to destroy it was the most modernly artistic thing an artist could do nowadays. Everyone is pricing their art for millions, while Banksy is making his free for the people to appreciate.</em>
Musket
Muskets are long and that’s what they used back then
Answer: D. They reveal that Belgium had false motivations for colonizing Africa.
Possible Answer: A. They reveal the central goal of European colonies in Africa.
Explanation: Paragraph 7 explains how Leopold plans of “abolishing slavery” and “establishing harmony” was all a scam. Leading to paragraph 8 revealing that Leopold was only focused on his personal business venture. D sounds like it’s the correct answer because his motivations were false, but the other European colonies were also focused on growing their power, so A could possibly be the correct answer too.
Answer:
in the first stanza, the speaker speaks from third person point of view, using the words "they, them", while in the 5th stanza, the speaker now speaks in first person point of view, using the word "my"
It's an infinitive, to + verb....