Explain the title why, you reckon?<span>
The title of this short story is a highlight of the moral. This story written
by Langston Hughes, narrates of a black man who, like many other in the
post-WWII United States which was in the middle of an economic depression, had
found himself wondering if money could buy you happiness, and why are rich
people not happy?</span>
<span>
</span>
Who is asking the question?<span>
The question is presented by the protagonist, who wonders why rich people are
unhappy, despite all the amount of money they have at their disposal. The young
man was poor and hungry and decided to go all the way committing a crime just
for the chance to buy himself a little bit of happiness. </span>
<span>
</span>
What are they wondering about?<span>
The protagonist is wondering if money could perhaps buy happiness, and if so,
why people who have money and power are still unhappy and bored with their
lives? He had always believed that money would make life easier (which is still
a vastly shared thought) and cannot understand how come people with money are
not afraid to lose them. </span>
<span>
</span>
Who are they asking?<span>
The question in the title is perhaps directed to the reader, creating a
connection between the story and the real, outside world. But in the story the
main character is wondering alone in the streets while asking this question to himself.
</span>
<span>
</span>
Why do they want to know?<span>
The main character is eager to understand whether money can buy happiness,
since he has started to doubt it after the encounter with the rich young man
who was excited about being robbed, describing the experience as one of the
most thrilling experiences of his life. The protagonist cannot comprehend how rich
people can still be unhappy and bored despite the immense fortune they have
available. </span>
If a writer is structuring an argument towards an audience that has an interest in a specific cause, the writer will use specific vocabulary, details, stories, and facts that appeal to that cause. Pathos (the use of emotional appeal in an argument) is a strong benefit to add to an argument, and the writer might take a specific story of someone who has been affected by the cause in order to make the audience emotional. If they become emotionally invested in the argument it is more likely to be effective. Additionally, specific vocabulary (including abbreviations) and relevant facts (logos) will help the audience understand and appreciate the argument. Finally, the author should establish their credibility (ethos) as an expert on the subject so that the audience trusts what they are saying.
Homophones sound alike but have different meaning so it is (D)
Answer:
The area of the photograph which emphasizes the hope to see the world on the other side of the Berlin Wall is the area marked above the wall, in the sky.
Explanation:
The Berlin Wall was literally a wall built with the purpose of dividing Berlin, the capital of Germany, into two. On one side, the city was capitalist, while on the other side, it was controlled by Soviet socialists. The wall stood from 1961 to 1989, and people who tried to cross it to escape the Soviet control would be caught or even killed.
Now, let's apply that information to the question at hand. In the photo, there are four areas marked with a red rectangle, and we are asked to choose the one that emphasizes the hope to see the world on the other side of the wall. <u>Imagine living in Soviet-controlled Berlin and hoping to escape it. Where would you look? The wall itself is the obstacle that should be overcome. The sky is what represents freedom. Looking at it gives us hope of an entire world waiting on the other side of the wall. Therefore, the area we should choose is the one marked in the sky.</u>
