I’m pretty sure it’s page 30, i may be wrong
<u>Explanation:</u>
<em>"Excerpt from Marine Mammals in Captivity"</em> by The Humane Society of the United States claims that marine animals such as Whales are naturally suitable for the open sea, and thus should not be confined.
The author provided evidence from findings that show that been kept in captivity is <em>"the probable cause of dorsal fin collapse."</em>
While in <em>"Excerpt from What Zoo Critics Don
’t Understand
" </em>by Jack Hanna, the author claims that leaving animals in confinement (like a zoo) may be considered the safest place for them instead of the sending into the wild.
To support his claims, he stated some of the challenges animals may face if exposed to the wild, such as,<em> </em><em>"habitat loss, poaching, severe weather, and war."</em>
In all, we <u>can conclude that the second author (Jack Hanna) seems to be more convincing based on the evidence he provided which can be applied to several wild animals.</u>
Answer:
The correct answer would be option b:"The author once felt pride and optimism about the war".
Explanation:
In the excerpt, the author says that "he was proud of the young American pilots sitting at the controls in the cockpit" and that "he was grateful for the opportunity to witness this adventure and report it".
It just says that he was excited to get on a U.S Army helicopter, it does not say nor infer that is was his first flying experience, therefore, option a is incorrect.
It doesn't say and it cannot be inferred that the U.S soldiers are trained in hand to hand combat, so option c is also incorrect.
The author barely mentions the Vietcong guerillas, and he does not seem to have any respect for them since he was excited about war, so option d is also incorrect.
I would say the answer is C.Slaves have a right to fight against injustice.
