1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mademuasel [1]
3 years ago
14

Recently there has been discussion in the news about taxing junk food (soft drinks, for example) in an effort to reduce the inci

dence of obesity in the U.S. Do you think the demand for junk food is elastic or inelastic with respect to price?
Based on your knowledge of the price elasticity of demand, do you think the deadweight loss of a soda/junk-food tax would be relatively large or relatively small? Why? Do you think taxing junk food would be a good idea? Based on your analysis, would it really help reduce the number of obese people in the United States? Explain please give me details.
History
1 answer:
skelet666 [1.2K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Throughout the clarification segment elsewhere here, the definition including its concern is mentioned.

Explanation:

  • Through me, the demand for amounts of unhealthy food seems to be inelastic in terms of costs. I acknowledge that as the cost goes up, consumers will consume less junk food, but perhaps the decrease in the supply is lower than that of the rising rise. It might be because, already though, substitutes for junk foods, particularly across the Us, are challenging to find. Unhealthy food is just the shortest and simplest meal to consume.
  • The reasoning here seems to be that every customer would have to purchase food even though the price rises by 1%, so consumption will still decrease by somewhere around 1%. So perhaps we can assume that quality does not influence quantities throughout the Junk Food industry.
  • The reduction of excess baggage would be small since it is inelastic. This symbolizes the corporation's low incompetence and as the cost is changed, the market for quantities is approximately the same, not so much impact.
  • I thought taxing junk foods, especially to maximize welfare spending, is a smart option. But obesity over here Is not going to help. The incorrect method for combating obesity as well as making our diets balanced is taxes. The irony is that all clients are impacted by taxes regardless of their weight status. The impact of food taxes is unclear and may result in the replacement of items that may comprise of calories that seem to be equivalent or higher.
You might be interested in
Which core subject includes civics and government
saw5 [17]
History. Lol..................
7 0
3 years ago
Why did the colonists oppose the taxes imposed after the French and Indian War?
ikadub [295]
The correct answer is <span>C. They claimed that since the colonies had no representation in Parliament, Parliament had no right to tax them.

They thought that the government should have no right to levy taxes if they don't have a representative in the British parliament. This was a rather widespread opinion which soon led to the beginning of the revolution.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Brainliest answer goes to whoever can answer ALL the blanks.
Mandarinka [93]

Answer:

1. January 1 1863

2. seek

3. food and plants

4. seeking

5. but

6. civil war end

7. black codes and Jim crow laws

8.rights

9. senate and having

10. barrios

8 0
3 years ago
How does biological determinism apply to the cult of domesticity
fenix001 [56]

Biological determinism is a canard that has repeatedly been explained away by evolutionary informed scientists since time immemorial. Humans are an inextricable mix of their genes and their environments. As a matter of fact, genes get turned on or off as a function of environmental inputs. Evolutionary-based cognitive computational systems take information from the environment to get activated. Natural selection itself, the foundational mechanism of evolution, is shaped by the selective forces within a specific environment. Hence, there is no such thing as biological determinism.

3 0
3 years ago
Why was cotton the most reliable and important mainly in the South?
klio [65]

Answer:

It helped make clothes, farmers grew cotton like it was a crop and had the slaves picking it. They earned money for it.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following was the most important factor that led to the mass migration of the first humans from Asia to America? A.
    11·2 answers
  • Which factor played a major in China's economic growth since the late 1970s?
    7·2 answers
  • According to the philosopher David Hume, the difference between humans and apes lies primarily in their ability to _____. use to
    10·2 answers
  • According to the press release, the federal courts have chosen at times to deal with local school districts by
    14·1 answer
  • CAN SOMEONE PLZ HELP ME IM HAVING PERMANENT BRAIN DAMAGE
    7·1 answer
  • How is the us congress depicted or represented in the cartoons?why?
    12·1 answer
  • Question 1
    12·1 answer
  • How did Hurricane Katrina lead to renewed concerns over civil rights in the United States? (5 points)
    15·2 answers
  • . Which of the following is a good example of a dictatorship?
    7·1 answer
  • Please help meeeeeee
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!