Answer:
Environmental scientists look for solutions to protect the environment, while chemists develop new products.
Explanation:
The last two sentences use the conjunction while meaning <em>whereas</em>, i.e. indicating a contrast. So the purpose of sentences 3 and 4 is to contrast certain things about environmental scientists and chemists. However, the fourth sentence contrasts only <u>level of education</u> required for these jobs.
The third sentence refers to <u>actual</u> <u>work</u> that environmental scientists and chemists do. Therefore, this sentence most accurately describes a way in which the jobs of environmental scientists and chemists contrast.
The above question wants to assess your ability to read and interpret speeches. In that case, I can't write the text for you, but I'll show you how to do it.
First, you should read Nixon's and Ford's speeches. In this reading, you should identify the objective of the speeches, that is, what Nixon and Ford want to achieve with the themes and topics presented in their speech.
Once you recognize these goals, you can write your text as follows:
- Introduce the main subject of your text.
- Show the objective of Nixon's speech and how that objective is developed during the speech.
- Show the objective of Ford's speech and how that objective is developed during the speech.
- Compare Nixon and Ford speech objectives, show similarities and differences.
- Also, compare the development of this theme and which development was most efficient.
- Show which speech was most likely to achieve the goal.
More information:
brainly.com/question/2285439?referrer=searchResults
Answer: B. Locking women away behind walls, screens, or curtains robs them of their dignity.
Explanation:
The author of this poem, Sarojini Naidu (1879 - 1946), came from a culture where women were to receive a different treatment from men. Women's freedom was taken away with the excuse of protecting them from "eyes impure". If their bodies and faces, their beauty and youth cannot be seen, then they will not be coveted. However, such a way of "protecting" has its own way of harming those involved. It does not "shield a woman's eyes from tears". It does not protect their feelings, does not take their wishes into consideration. It only limits their lives, their abilities, their happiness.
Answer:
I imagine It may be difficult for only children to understand the kind of brotherly relationship that includes both devoted love and the most ruthless hatred. But my personal experience allowed me to better understand the brother´s relationship and therefore the text itself.
Explanation:
Text-to-self connections are the most interesting for me. Books often provide me comfort and helpful tools to apply in my personal life. The Outsider made me think of my family, specifically my relationship with my brothers. I love both of them, but family issues, mostly related to financial problems, often get in the way of us having a good relationship. We fight a lot.
I find a sign of hope in how Darry and Ponyboy reconcile at the end, at Sodapop´s request. Their brotherhood overcomes Dally’s and Johnny’s deaths while strengthening their family bond. I hope my brothers and I can someday do the same with our own issues.
