Some people were concerned about the new pop culture and global village in the 1960s because they were worried that local cultures would disappear in an international pop culture
Hope this helps
Answer:
Case background
1. Identify the plaintiff and defendant in the case.
2. Explain why the case was brought to the Supreme Court.
3. Describe the goal of each side in the case. What type of decision was desired?
Constitutional connections
4. Explain the key rights or amendments involved in the case.
5. Did the case primarily center on an issue of civil rights or civil liberties? Explain.
Case outcomes
6. Describe the majority decision of the court and several arguments as to why the justices ruled the way they did.
7. If there was one dissenting decision of the court, explain it in detail. Why did some justices disagree with the majority?
8. What precedent was set by the court’s decision? What impact did it have on American society?
Explanation:
The One-Way ANOVA test represents the best choice if one wants to compare the average number of adjustments made by service representatives at five different locations within a region.
The null hypothesis, which claims that samples from populations with the same mean values are used to create all of the groups' samples, is tested by the ANOVA.
The population variance is estimated twice to accomplish this. Numerous assumptions underlie these estimations. An F-statistic is generated by the ANOVA and represents the proportion of variation within the samples to variance estimated among the means.
According to the central limit theorem, the variance of the group means should be less than the variance of the samples if the group means are taken from populations with similar mean values. A larger ratio suggests that samples were taken from populations with different mean values, which is implied by a higher ratio.
To learn more about the One-Way ANOVA test refer to:
brainly.com/question/23638404
#SPJ1
Answer:
Relevant; comparison
Explanation:
The comparison question test (CQT) posits that guilty individuals react more strongly to Relevant questions, whereas innocent individuals react more strongly to comparison questions.
The comparison question test (CQT) is one of the several questioning technique used in polygraph test, it designed to make comparative responses to relevant question with those of control questions i.e control for the effect of generally threatening nature of relevant question.
Making use of CQT assumes that physiological measures while lying will be greater than physiological measure while telling the truth. An innocent individual who is telling the truth react to comparison questions more than relevant question because these questions are design to arouse the subject concern about their past truthiness
