It is was Rutherford Hayes.
The Civil War has been something of an enigma for scholars studying American history. During the first half of the twentieth century, historians viewed the war as a major turning point in American economic history. Charles Beard labeled it “Second American Revolution,” claiming that “at bottom the so-called Civil War – was a social war, ending in the unquestioned establishment of a new power in the government, making vast changes – in the course of industrial development, and in the constitution inherited from the Fathers” (Beard and Beard 1927: 53). By the time of the Second World War, Louis Hacker could sum up Beard’s position by simply stating that the war’s “striking achievement was the triumph of industrial capitalism” (Hacker 1940: 373). The “Beard-Hacker Thesis” had become the most widely accepted interpretation of the economic impact of the Civil War. Harold Faulkner devoted two chapters to a discussion of the causes and consequences of the war in his 1943 textbook American Economic History (which was then in its fifth edition), claiming that “its effects upon our industrial, financial, and commercial history were profound” (1943: 340).
Answer:
<em>Germany was divided into four occupation zones, each controlled by an Ally </em><em>is a result of the Postdam Conference. </em>
Explanation:
The <u>Postdam Conference</u> was the third conference between the leaders of the so-called Big Three nations -Britain, the Soviet Union and the United States. In this meeting, the Allies agreed on the future of Germany: they did not only agreed that Germany would be demilitarized, but also that this country should be divided into four parts. The US, the UK, France and the USSR would take control of one part each.
It will eventually be destroyed or faded away
Answer:
US constitution ratified, US bill of rights ratified, Articles of Convention ratified, Pinckney Proposal, Philadelphis Convention, and Annapolis convention.
Explanation:
Hope this helps you Merry Christmas!
