Central American religion is home to various cultural beliefs originated from Spanish and Indian Culture.
The ethnicity of "Mexican" is believed to originate from European Spanish and Central Native descent, traced to Spain exploration throughout the 1700s-1800s.
This caused a shared blend of cultures and hybrid beliefs in both cultures, having Spain introducing their boy Jesus with their Catholic roots and Central America having monotheistic beliefs of sacrifices and multiple Gods.
This is like basic facts on the history to your question.
Answer:
In 1838 and 1839, as part of Andrew Jackson's Indian removal policy, the Cherokee nation was forced to give up its lands east of the Mississippi River and to migrate to an area in present-day Oklahoma. The Cherokee people called this journey the "Trail of Tears," because of its devastating effects.
Explanation:
1. Yes i do, cause the government can easily power over the people but as soons as they do that the people will then take back the government there fore the constitution is not used by the government to control us cause if they did we could easily over turn them
2. there take of the constitution under my understanding is that if the government does something that makes the people unhappy they can look back at the constitution and say you are braking this law and now you are being over turned.
3.the social contract says that it obtains to everyone not just the people that arent in some type of government or the richest person ever it obtains to everyone. so his statment reflect cause hes saying that if the government tries to say something to use we can something back and say the constitution says we are allowed to do that or we arent. for example the right to carry a weapon we are but its not because of we like to hunt or go target shooting no its because if the government turns on us we can protect our selfs.
Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/1137967#readmore
Antifederalists were the people who were against the ratification of the United States Constitution.
- Many of them supported a weak central government because they equated a strong central government with British tyranny.
- Some antifederalists wanted to encourage democracy and were afraid of a strong government because they thought it would be dominated by wealthy people.
- They also believed that if states were ceding too much power to the federal government. They also objected to the lack of any guarantee of individual rights in the constitution.
- Mostly small, self-reliant, and independent farmers supported Anti Federalism. Most farmers were mostly uneducated and provincial.
- Their crops, families, and local matters were more important for they paid little attention to the foreign countries and were content with the weak confederate government.
- Antifederalists were lead by James Winthrop, Patrik Henry, George Mason, and Melancton Smith. Patrik Henry was the main leader.
So, E) Wealthy, educated members of the elite
Know more about Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists here:
brainly.com/question/22956277?referrer=searchResults
Hello~
The answer(s) to your question is A, C, and D.
Individuals began to start more private businesses.
New banking systems financed the growth of business.
Factories began to employ specialized workers.
~Hope this answer your question!~